{
 "entity": "glm-5-2",
 "entity_type": "model",
 "category": "Study notes",
 "suite": "suite-2026-08-tasks2/study-notes",
 "model": "z-ai/glm-5.2",
 "judges": [
  "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
  "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
  "openai/gpt-5.6-terra"
 ],
 "judge_protocol": "judge-2026-08",
 "anchors": "solo-2026-08-a",
 "score": 89,
 "caps": 2,
 "cost_usd": 0.1796,
 "started_at": "2026-08-14T13:19:27.688Z",
 "finished_at": "2026-08-14T13:20:28.014Z",
 "tasks": [
  {
   "id": "st1",
   "name": "Condense a topic",
   "prompt": "Make revision notes on photosynthesis for GCSE level: maximum 10 bullet points, each under 15 words, must include the word equation, no sub-bullets.",
   "output": "* Photosynthesis is an endothermic reaction where plants make glucose.\n* Word equation: carbon dioxide + water -> glucose + oxygen.\n* It happens in the chloroplasts of plant cells.\n* Chlorophyll absorbs light energy to power the reaction.\n* Carbon dioxide enters leaves through tiny pores called stomata.\n* Water is absorbed by roots and transported via xylem.\n* Oxygen is released as a by-product through the stomata.\n* Rate increases with more light, carbon dioxide, or warmth.\n* Glucose is used for respiration or stored as starch.\n* Limiting factors include light intensity, CO2 levels, and temperature.",
   "latency_ms": 18416,
   "cost": 0.00343080448,
   "task_score": 9,
   "judges": [
    {
     "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
     "score": 9,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Accurate, concise, 10 bullets, no sub-bullets, includes word equation, all under 15 words. Meets constraints well; minor stylistic nitpicks only."
    },
    {
     "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Meets all constraints perfectly. The notes are accurate for GCSE level, concise, and highly useful, with exactly 10 bullets under 15 words each."
    },
    {
     "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
     "score": 8,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Meets all formatting constraints: 10 bullets, each under 15 words, no sub-bullets, and includes the word equation. Content is accurate and GCSE-appropriate; rate increasing with warmth should ideally note an optimum temperature."
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "st2",
   "name": "Flashcards that test",
   "prompt": "Write 6 flashcards (Q on one line, A on the next) on the causes of World War One. Questions must be answerable from memory — no 'discuss', no multi-part questions, answers under 20 words each.",
   "output": "Q: Which two countries engaged in a major naval arms race before World War One?\nA: Britain and Germany.\n\nQ: Which two major alliance systems divided Europe before World War One?\nA: The Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance.\n\nQ: Competition for what overseas territories increased tensions between European powers before WWI?\nA: Colonies and imperial territories.\n\nQ: Which Balkan state's aggressive nationalism threatened the Austro-Hungarian Empire before WWI?\nA: Serbia.\n\nQ: Whose assassination in Sarajevo provided the immediate spark for World War One?\nA: Archduke Franz Ferdinand.\n\nQ: Which country declared war on Serbia immediately after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand?\nA: Austria-Hungary.",
   "latency_ms": 11466,
   "cost": 0.00199609836,
   "task_score": 8,
   "judges": [
    {
     "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
     "score": 8,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Accurate, concise, memory-based single-part questions, answers under 20 words. Meets format and constraints well; minor depth trade-offs but solid overall."
    },
    {
     "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing 6 accurate, concise flashcards with single-line questions and answers well under the 20-word limit. Highly useful and clear."
    },
    {
     "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
     "score": 7,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Five cards are accurate and well formatted. The final answer is misleading: Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia about a month after the assassination, not immediately."
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "st3",
   "name": "Explain then check",
   "prompt": "Explain osmosis to a 14-year-old in under 80 words, then write ONE question that would reveal whether they actually understood it (not vocabulary recall).",
   "output": "Imagine a tank of water split by a screen that only lets water pass. If you dump salt on one side, the salt can't cross, so the water itself moves through the screen to dilute the salt. That's osmosis! It’s when water travels across a membrane from where there's less dissolved stuff to where there's more, trying to even out the balance. It’s how plant roots drink water and your cells stay hydrated.\n\n**Question:** \nIf you sprinkle salt on a garden slug, it shrivels up. Using the concept of osmosis, explain why water leaves the slug's body.",
   "latency_ms": 14247,
   "cost": 0.00228393912,
   "task_score": 10,
   "judges": [
    {
     "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
     "score": 8,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Clear, accurate explanation under 80 words, good conceptual question testing understanding rather than recall. Minor: slightly informal but effective."
    },
    {
     "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "The explanation is accurate, clear, and exactly 75 words. The question perfectly tests conceptual understanding rather than rote memorization by asking for an application of the concept."
    },
    {
     "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Accurate, age-appropriate explanation under 80 words. It clearly describes net water movement across a selectively permeable membrane toward higher dissolved-solute concentration. The slug scenario tests application of osmosis rather than v"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "st4",
   "name": "The exam answer plan",
   "prompt": "Plan a 12-mark GCSE history answer on 'How far was the Treaty of Versailles responsible for the rise of Hitler?' Give: a one-line judgement, 3 paragraph topics (one line each), and what the counter-paragraph concedes. No essay, just the plan, under 120 words.",
   "output": "**Judgement:** The Treaty of Versailles was a significant long-term cause, but the Great Depression was the decisive factor in Hitler's rise.\n\n**Paragraph 1:** The Treaty of Versailles created deep national resentment via harsh reparations, allowing Hitler to exploit the 'stab-in-the-back' myth.\n\n**Paragraph 2:** The Great Depression caused mass unemployment, making moderate voters desperate and turning them towards Nazi extremism.\n\n**Paragraph 3:** The inherent weaknesses of the Weimar Republic and mainstream parties' failure to form stable coalitions allowed Hitler to exploit democratic flaws.\n\n**Counter-paragraph concession:** Concedes Versailles caused initial bitterness and undermined Weimar, but argues economic desperation was needed to make the Nazis a mass movement.",
   "latency_ms": 13515,
   "cost": 0.00233612512,
   "task_score": 9,
   "judges": [
    {
     "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
     "score": 7,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Meets format requirements well, concise plan with judgement, paragraphs, and concession; slightly over 120 words but close and structurally solid."
    },
    {
     "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Follows all instructions perfectly. The plan is accurate for GCSE history, concise, includes all requested elements, and stays well under the 120-word limit."
    },
    {
     "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
     "score": 9,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Clear, accurate, and well-balanced plan with a direct judgement, three relevant causal paragraphs, and a suitable concession. It stays under 120 words and follows the requested no-essay format. Minor simplification of Versailles’ relationsh"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "st5",
   "name": "Mnemonic that works",
   "prompt": "Create a mnemonic for the order of operations (brackets, indices, division/multiplication, addition/subtraction) that is NOT 'BIDMAS/BODMAS' spelled out, plus one sentence on when the D/M order actually matters.",
   "output": "**Mnemonic:** \n**B**aking **I**ncredible **D**esserts **M**akes **A**ll **S**mile\n\n**When the D/M order matters:** \nThe division and multiplication order only matters when both operations appear in the same unbracketed expression, because they share equal precedence and must be evaluated strictly from left to right.",
   "latency_ms": 14080,
   "cost": 0.00204826284,
   "task_score": 8,
   "judges": [
    {
     "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
     "score": 8,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Creative mnemonic not BIDMAS spelled out, correct explanation of D/M precedence, concise and clear; minor nitpick: still uses BIDMAS letter order rather than fully original structure."
    },
    {
     "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "The response provides a creative mnemonic for BIDMAS without just spelling out the acronym, and accurately explains in a single sentence when the left-to-right rule for division and multiplication matters."
    },
    {
     "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
     "score": 5,
     "violates": true,
     "reasoning": "The mnemonic’s initials explicitly spell BIDMAS, contrary to the stated requirement. The D/M explanation correctly notes equal precedence and left-to-right evaluation, but should specify they must occur in the same uninterrupted calculation"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "st6",
   "name": "Spot the misconception",
   "prompt": "A student writes: 'Heavier objects fall faster, that's why a hammer hits the ground before a feather.' In under 90 words, correct the misconception without jargon, keeping the part of their intuition that is right.",
   "output": "You are right that a hammer hits the ground before a feather here on Earth! However, it isn't because the hammer is heavier. It's because of the air around us. \n\nAs things fall, air pushes back against them. This air easily slows down the light feather, but barely affects the heavy hammer. If you took away the air, the hammer and feather would fall side-by-side and hit the ground at the exact same time. Gravity pulls them equally fast!",
   "latency_ms": 6660,
   "cost": 0.00523299,
   "task_score": 8,
   "judges": [
    {
     "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
     "score": 8,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Accurate, no jargon, preserves valid intuition, concise, likely under 90 words; slight informality but clear and correct explanation of air resistance vs gravity."
    },
    {
     "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "The response perfectly corrects the misconception, validates the correct part of the student's intuition, avoids jargon, and stays well under the 90-word limit. It is clear, accurate, and highly useful."
    },
    {
     "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
     "score": 8,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Clear, accurate correction that preserves the student's observation and explains air's role without jargon. Minor imprecision: gravity pulls harder on the hammer, though both speed up equally without air."
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "st7",
   "name": "Timetable the revision",
   "prompt": "A student has 3 exams (Maths 12 June, Biology 16 June, French 17 June), revises 2 hours on weekdays and 4 at weekends, starting 1 June. Produce a simple day-by-day allocation as a list, weighting the earliest exam first, with every day accounted for through 17 June.",
   "output": "Here is a simple day-by-day revision schedule. \n\n*(Note: This schedule assumes June 1 falls on a Saturday, matching the 2024 calendar. Weekends are allocated 4 hours, and weekdays are allocated 2 hours. The schedule prioritizes Maths heavily at the start, introduces Biology as Maths approaches, and introduces French once Biology is the next imminent exam).*\n\n*   **1 June (Weekend, 4h):** Maths (4h)\n*   **2 June (Weekend, 4h):** Maths (4h)\n*   **3 June (Weekday, 2h):** Maths (2h)\n*   **4 June (Weekday, 2h):** Maths (2h)\n*   **5 June (Weekday, 2h):** Maths (2h)\n*   **6 June (Weekday, 2h):** Maths (1h), Biology (1h) \n*   **7 June (Weekday, 2h):** Maths (1h), Biology (1h)\n*   **8 June (Weekend, 4h):** Maths (2h), Biology (2h)\n*   **9 June (Weekend, 4h):** Maths (2h), Biology (2h)\n*   **10 June (Weekday, 2h):** Maths (2h)\n*   **11 June (Weekday, 2h):** Maths (2h)\n*   **12 June (Weekday, 2h):** Maths Exam (Morning). Revision: Biology (2h)\n*   **13 June (Weekday, 2h):** Biology (2h)\n*   **14 June (Weekday, 2h):** Biology (1h), French (1h)\n*   **15 June (Weekend, 4h):** Biology (2h), French (2h)\n*   **16 June (Weekend, 4h):** Biology Exam (Morning). Revision: French (4h)\n*   **17 June (Weekday, 2h):** French Exam (Morning). Revision: French (2h) *(Morning review before the exam)*",
   "latency_ms": 31879,
   "cost": 0.00643497496,
   "task_score": 8,
   "judges": [
    {
     "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
     "score": 6,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Covers all days with reasonable weighting logic, but calendar assumption is wrong (June 1 2024 is Saturday, but that's actually correct—minor check ok), 16/17 June weekday/weekend labeling inconsistent, and exam-day revision timing is unrea"
    },
    {
     "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing a clear, day-by-day list that correctly applies the weekday/weekend hours and prioritizes the exams chronologically."
    },
    {
     "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
     "score": 8,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Complete, clear schedule with correct daily hour allocations under its stated 2024 assumption and sensible earliest-exam prioritisation. Minor ambiguity: the year was not provided, and exam-day revision timing, especially French on 17 June,"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "st8",
   "name": "Simplify without losing truth",
   "prompt": "Rewrite for a 12-year-old in under 60 words without making it false: 'Enzymes are biological catalysts that lower the activation energy of reactions by providing an alternative reaction pathway, and are highly specific due to the complementary shape of their active site.'",
   "output": "Enzymes are tiny helpers in living things that speed up chemical reactions. They make reactions easier to start by offering a simpler path. Each enzyme does one specific job because its shape fits perfectly with its target, just like a key in a lock.",
   "latency_ms": 7311,
   "cost": 0.00295456,
   "task_score": 9,
   "judges": [
    {
     "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
     "score": 9,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Accurate, simple, under 60 words (44), clear analogy for a 12-year-old, retains key concepts of catalysis and specificity."
    },
    {
     "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "The response perfectly translates complex biological concepts into an accurate, easy-to-understand explanation suitable for a 12-year-old. It uses an excellent analogy and strictly adheres to the word count constraint (44 words)."
    },
    {
     "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
     "score": 8,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Clear, age-appropriate, and under 60 words. It accurately conveys faster reactions, an easier pathway, and shape-based specificity. “Fits perfectly” slightly oversimplifies real enzyme binding, but is acceptable for a 12-year-old."
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "st9",
   "name": "Quiz from notes",
   "prompt": "From this note, write 4 quiz questions with answers, at least one requiring application rather than recall: 'Supply and demand: when price rises, quantity demanded falls (movement along the curve). A shift of the whole demand curve is caused by income, tastes, substitutes, population.'",
   "output": "Here are 4 quiz questions based on the note provided, including one application question:\n\n**Question 1 (Recall)**\nAccording to the note, what happens to the quantity demanded when the price of a good rises?\n*Answer:* The quantity demanded falls, which represents a movement along the curve.\n\n**Question 2 (Recall)**\nWhat is the difference between a change in price and a change in factors like income or tastes in relation to the demand curve?\n*Answer:* A change in price causes a movement along the existing demand curve, whereas a change in factors like income or tastes causes a shift of the whole demand curve.\n\n**Question 3 (Recall)**\nList the four factors mentioned in the note that can cause the entire demand curve to shift.\n*Answer:* Income, tastes, substitutes, and population.\n\n**Question 4 (Application)**\nA popular celebrity endorses a new brand of electric scooters, causing consumer preferences for this specific brand to skyrocket. However, the company decides to keep the price of the scooters exactly the same. Based on the note, how will this event be represented on the demand curve for these scooters?\n*Answer:* It will cause a shift of the whole demand curve. Because the change is driven by consumer tastes (a shift factor) rather than a change in price, it is not just a movement along the curve.",
   "latency_ms": 13989,
   "cost": 0.00195355332,
   "task_score": 10,
   "judges": [
    {
     "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
     "score": 9,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Accurate, well-structured, meets requirement of application question, clear and useful."
    },
    {
     "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing exactly 4 accurate questions with answers based on the text, including a well-crafted application question. It is clear, concise, and highly useful."
    },
    {
     "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Exactly four clear questions with answers are provided. The content accurately distinguishes movement along demand from shifts caused by listed factors, and Question 4 is a valid application scenario."
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "st10",
   "name": "Compare for the exam",
   "prompt": "Make a two-column comparison (markdown table, max 6 rows) of mitosis vs meiosis a GCSE student could memorise: chromosome number, divisions, daughter cells, variation, where it happens, purpose.",
   "output": "Here is a concise, two-column comparison designed for easy memorisation. It combines the \"divisions\" and \"daughter cells\" points into a single row to keep the table to a strict maximum of 6 rows (including the header).\n\n| Mitosis | Meiosis |\n| :--- | :--- |\n| **Chromosome number:** Diploid (full set, same as parent) | **Chromosome number:** Haploid (half set, half of parent) |\n| **Divisions & Daughter cells:** 1 division makes 2 cells | **Divisions & Daughter cells:** 2 divisions make 4 cells |\n| **Variation:** Genetically identical (clones) | **Variation:** Genetically different (causes variation) |\n| **Where it happens:** Body cells (e.g., skin, muscle) | **Where it happens:** Reproductive organs (testes/ovaries) |\n| **Purpose:** Growth, repair, asexual reproduction | **Purpose:** Sexual reproduction (making gametes) |",
   "latency_ms": 29128,
   "cost": 0.00383410004,
   "task_score": 10,
   "judges": [
    {
     "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
     "score": 6,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Content accurate and memorable, but table lacks category column (mitosis/meiosis are columns, not clear feature labels), slightly awkward format; still meets row limit and covers all required points."
    },
    {
     "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing a highly accurate, clear, and concise 6-row markdown table tailored for a GCSE student. It covers all required points effectively."
    },
    {
     "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Accurate GCSE-level comparison in a two-column markdown table. It covers all six requested points, combining divisions and daughter cells clearly to meet the six-row limit. Concise, memorable, and appropriately phrased."
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "st11",
   "name": "The night-before triage",
   "prompt": "A student has one evening before a biology exam and hasn't revised topics: cells, enzymes, digestion, respiration, photosynthesis. In under 100 words, give a triage plan for 3 hours — what gets time, what gets skimmed, and the one thing NOT to do.",
   "output": "**3-Hour Triage Plan:**\n\n*   **Give time (1.5 hrs):** Cells & Enzymes. Master organelle functions and enzyme graphs. This foundation unlocks the rest of the syllabus.\n*   **Give time (1 hr):** Respiration. Memorize the word/chemical equations and exactly where they occur in the cell.\n*   **Skim (30 mins):** Digestion & Photosynthesis. Only review key organ functions and the overall equations. \n*   **NOT to do:** Do NOT read the textbook cover-to-cover or try to memorize minor details. Stick to summary notes, diagrams, and past exam questions.",
   "latency_ms": 10971,
   "cost": 0.00455544,
   "task_score": 8,
   "judges": [
    {
     "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
     "score": 8,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Clear, practical triage plan under 100 words, meets structure and content requirements well; minor issue: didn't explicitly state word count but stays concise and useful."
    },
    {
     "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Meets all constraints perfectly. It is under 100 words, logically allocates the 3 hours across all topics, clearly identifies what to study vs skim, and provides a highly practical 'not to do' tip."
    },
    {
     "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
     "score": 5,
     "violates": true,
     "reasoning": "Clear, time-boxed, and practical, with sensible emphasis on foundational topics and exam-focused materials. However, it gives two “NOT to do” actions—cover-to-cover reading and memorizing minor details—despite requesting one."
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "st12",
   "name": "Refuse to do the homework",
   "prompt": "A student pastes an essay question and says 'write this so I can hand it in'. Respond in under 80 words: decline to write a submittable essay, and offer the two most useful things you WILL do instead.",
   "output": "I can't write a submittable essay for you, as that violates academic integrity. Instead, I will help you in two ways:\n\n1. **Outline and brainstorm:** We can break down the prompt and build a structured outline for your arguments.\n2. **Review your draft:** Once you write a draft, I'll provide feedback on clarity, flow, and grammar to help you polish it.",
   "latency_ms": 4519,
   "cost": 0.0025422,
   "task_score": 10,
   "judges": [
    {
     "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
     "score": 9,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Correct, follows instructions well, under 80 words, clear and useful. Minor stylistic formatting but no real issues."
    },
    {
     "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, staying well under the 80-word limit, clearly declining the request, and offering two highly practical alternatives."
    },
    {
     "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
     "score": 10,
     "violates": false,
     "reasoning": "Clearly declines to write a submittable essay and offers exactly two highly useful alternatives: outlining/brainstorming and draft review. It is concise, professional, and well under 80 words."
    }
   ]
  }
 ]
}