{
  "entity": "glm-5-2",
  "entity_type": "model",
  "category": "Presentations",
  "suite": "suite-2026-08-tasks4/presentations",
  "model": "z-ai/glm-5.2",
  "judges": [
    "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
    "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
    "openai/gpt-5.6-terra"
  ],
  "judge_protocol": "judge-2026-08b",
  "anchors": "solo-2026-08-a",
  "score": 87,
  "caps": 0,
  "cost_usd": 0.1769,
  "started_at": "2026-08-16T14:05:04.055Z",
  "finished_at": "2026-08-16T14:11:36.500Z",
  "tasks": [
    {
      "id": "pr1",
      "name": "Deck from a standing start",
      "prompt": "Plan a 10-minute presentation to the parish council proposing a zebra crossing outside St Mary's Primary. You have: 2 near-misses reported this term, a 140-signature petition, and an estimated £24,000 cost. Outline 8 slides — for each give a short title and the one point that slide must land. The ask (a feasibility study, not the money) must arrive by slide 3, not the end.",
      "output": "Here is the outline for your 10-minute presentation to the parish council:\n\n**Slide 1: The Danger at St Mary's**\n*   **The point to land:** Traffic speed and volume during school drop-off and pick-up times pose an unacceptable, daily risk to our children’s safety.\n\n**Slide 2: Immediate Evidence**\n*   **The point to land:** Two reported near-misses involving children already this term prove the danger is active and immediate, not just a hypothetical concern.\n\n**Slide 3: The Ask**\n*   **The point to land:** We are asking the council to commission a formal feasibility study for a zebra crossing outside the school gates. \n\n**Slide 4: Community Mandate**\n*   **The point to land:** This is not a fringe request; 140 local parents and residents have signed a petition demanding intervention.\n\n**Slide 5: The Solution**\n*   **The point to land:** A zebra crossing provides a clear, highly visible, and legally enforceable right of way that naturally slows traffic and protects pedestrians.\n\n**Slide 6: The Investment**\n*   **The point to land:** The estimated cost is £24,000—a modest, highly reasonable investment for child safety that can be planned for in the next budget cycle.\n\n**Slide 7: Broader Benefits**\n*   **The point to land:** Beyond safety, a designated crossing will improve traffic flow during the school run and encourage more families to walk, reducing local congestion.\n\n**Slide 8: Decision Today**\n*   **The point to land:** Please vote to approve the feasibility study today so we can take the first concrete step toward securing a safe route to school.",
      "latency_ms": 10906,
      "cost": 0.005587,
      "task_score": 8,
      "judges": [
        {
          "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Meets all constraints: 8 slides, ask at slide 3, cost/petition/near-misses included, clear one-point-per-slide structure, concise and useful."
        },
        {
          "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, including all required facts, exactly 8 slides with titles and single points, and places the ask on slide 3. It is clear, concise, and highly useful."
        },
        {
          "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Clear eight-slide structure, includes all supplied evidence and puts the feasibility-study ask on slide 3. It is practical and concise. Some claims about traffic volume, legal effects, traffic flow, and budget planning are unsupported by th"
        }
      ],
      "machine_checks": null,
      "machine_violation": false,
      "machine_reasons": []
    },
    {
      "id": "pr2",
      "name": "Speaker notes, not an essay",
      "prompt": "Write the speaker notes (max 120 words) for a single slide titled 'Why we lost the Henderson account'. Facts: response times slipped from 4 hours to 2 days over six months; the client flagged it twice; a competitor promised same-day. The notes must sound like a person talking, admit the failure plainly, and set up the next slide, which is the fix. Return only the notes.",
      "output": "Let’s be honest about Henderson—we dropped the ball. Over the last six months, our response times slipped from four hours to two days. That’s unacceptable. The client flagged this exact issue twice, and we didn't course-crect fast enough. Meanwhile, a competitor came in and promised same-day turnaround. We lost the account because we failed to hold our baseline and ignored the warning signs. No excuses. But we know exactly what went wrong, and we know how to fix it. Let's move to the next slide and look at our plan to ensure this never happens again.",
      "latency_ms": 9110,
      "cost": 0.00239445,
      "task_score": 8,
      "judges": [
        {
          "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Meets word limit, sounds conversational, admits failure plainly, sets up next slide. Minor typo 'course-crect' slightly hurts polish."
        },
        {
          "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Follows all instructions and constraints perfectly, including word count and required facts. The tone is appropriate. However, there is a noticeable typo ('course-crect') which prevents a perfect score."
        },
        {
          "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Accurately covers all facts, plainly admits failure, uses a natural speaking tone, and clearly transitions to the fix. Minor polish issue: “course-crect” is a noticeable typo, and “ensure this never happens again” is slightly absolute."
        }
      ],
      "machine_checks": {
        "max_words": 120
      },
      "machine_violation": false,
      "machine_reasons": []
    },
    {
      "id": "pr3",
      "name": "One slide, not a memo",
      "prompt": "Turn this paragraph into ONE slide: a headline of max 8 words, then max 4 bullets. Paragraph: 'Following an extensive review of our logistics operations, the board has decided to relocate the central warehouse from the Norwich site to a larger facility outside Peterborough. The move is scheduled for the first week of March and is expected to reduce average delivery times to our northern customers by around a day and a half. There will be no redundancies: all fourteen warehouse staff have been offered relocation packages or transfers to the Norwich retail branch. Customers should see no disruption, as the two sites will run in parallel for a fortnight during the changeover.'",
      "output": "**Central Warehouse Relocation to Peterborough**\n\n*   Move to larger facility scheduled for first week of March.\n*   Reduces northern customer delivery times by 1.5 days.\n*   No redundancies; 14 staff offered relocation or branch transfers.\n*   Zero customer disruption; sites run in parallel for two weeks.",
      "latency_ms": 3108,
      "cost": 0.0030338,
      "task_score": 9,
      "judges": [
        {
          "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
          "score": 9,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Headline within 8 words, 4 concise accurate bullets capturing key facts; clear, well-formatted, minor stylistic choices don't detract."
        },
        {
          "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions. The headline is under 8 words, there are exactly 4 bullets, and the content is accurate, concise, and highly useful for a professional presentation."
        },
        {
          "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
          "score": 9,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Meets all slide constraints: 5-word headline and 4 bullets. Accurately captures timing, larger facility, delivery benefit, staff protections, and parallel operations. “Zero customer disruption” is slightly stronger than the source’s “should"
        }
      ],
      "machine_checks": {
        "max_bullets": 4
      },
      "machine_violation": false,
      "machine_reasons": []
    },
    {
      "id": "pr4",
      "name": "The first 30 seconds",
      "prompt": "Write the spoken opening (max 80 words) of a careers-evening talk to 40 sixth-formers about plumbing apprenticeships. It must earn attention in the first sentence with something concrete from these true facts: day-one pay £15k rising to £32k qualified; a Christmas Day callout; zero student debt. It must not begin with 'Hello' or 'Good evening' and must not introduce the speaker — banned phrase: 'my name is'.",
      "output": "Picture earning £15,000 from day one and £32,000 once qualified, with zero student debt, until you get a callout on Christmas Day because someone’s boiler has flooded their living room. That is the reality of a plumbing apprenticeship. Forget university lectures and borrowing money. You get paid to learn a trade that keeps the modern world running. You will be the hero of the holiday season, armed with a wrench and a steady paycheck. Let’s talk about starting.",
      "latency_ms": 22417,
      "cost": 0.0026255064,
      "task_score": 8,
      "judges": [
        {
          "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Meets word limit, opens with concrete fact, avoids banned phrases/greetings. Engaging but slightly clichéd ending; solid overall."
        },
        {
          "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all constraints, including word count and banned phrases. The opening sentence successfully integrates the required concrete facts, and the tone is highly engaging for sixth-formers."
        },
        {
          "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Strong, engaging opening that uses concrete pay, debt and Christmas callout facts immediately. It meets length and banned-opening constraints. Minor issue: “boiler has flooded” is imprecise; a leaking boiler or burst pipe would be more accu"
        }
      ],
      "machine_checks": {
        "max_words": 80,
        "banned": [
          "my name is"
        ]
      },
      "machine_violation": false,
      "machine_reasons": []
    },
    {
      "id": "pr5",
      "name": "Slide on a diet",
      "prompt": "This slide is for a 5-minute update to the senior team. Cut it to the bullets that help them DECIDE something — max 4 bullets, nothing else added. Slide 'Office move update': - Project kicked off on 4 June as agreed - Weekly meetings have been held every Tuesday - The project team has worked very hard - Three sites shortlisted, all within 2 miles of the station - Broadband installation lead time is 6 weeks, which is now the critical path - We looked at many options for furniture - Costs are tracking 8% under the £90k budget - The tone of meetings has been very positive - Decision needed by 30 September or we lose the preferred site.",
      "output": "- Three sites shortlisted, all within 2 miles of the station\n- Broadband installation lead time is 6 weeks, which is now the critical path\n- Costs are tracking 8% under the £90k budget\n- Decision needed by 30 September or we lose the preferred site",
      "latency_ms": 4937,
      "cost": 0.0031064,
      "task_score": 10,
      "judges": [
        {
          "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
          "score": 9,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Correctly selects the four decision-relevant bullets, meets constraint, concise and useful for senior team decision-making."
        },
        {
          "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing exactly 4 highly relevant bullets for decision-making without adding any extra text. It is concise and highly useful for a senior team."
        },
        {
          "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Exactly four concise, decision-relevant bullets. It retains the site options, critical-path constraint, budget position, and the deadline/consequence needed for a senior decision, while excluding non-decision status detail."
        }
      ],
      "machine_checks": {
        "max_bullets": 4
      },
      "machine_violation": false,
      "machine_reasons": []
    },
    {
      "id": "pr6",
      "name": "Right chart, right headline",
      "prompt": "A slide must show these figures: complaints per month — Jan 42, Feb 44, Mar 41, Apr 78, May 80, Jun 83. The April jump coincided with a new phone system. Say which chart type you would use and why (one sentence), write the slide headline as a FINDING (not 'Complaints data'), and name the one annotation you would add to the chart itself.",
      "output": "**Chart Type and Why:** \nI would use a column chart because it clearly isolates the month-by-month totals while visually emphasizing the sharp, sustained inflection point that occurred in April. \n\n**Slide Headline:** \nNew Phone System Rollout in April Triggered a Sustained Near-Doubling of Monthly Complaints\n\n**Chart Annotation:** \nA callout arrow pointing directly at the April data point labeled \"New phone system launched.\"",
      "latency_ms": 51878,
      "cost": 0.002325,
      "task_score": 9,
      "judges": [
        {
          "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
          "score": 9,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Meets all requirements: appropriate chart type with reason, finding-based headline, clear annotation. Concise and accurate."
        },
        {
          "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing a one-sentence rationale for the chart type, a clear finding-based headline, and an appropriate annotation. It is highly useful and concise."
        },
        {
          "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
          "score": 6,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Column chart and annotation are appropriate, and the headline is a finding. However, “triggered” asserts causation when the task only says the jump coincided with the phone-system rollout; it should describe an association."
        }
      ],
      "machine_checks": null,
      "machine_violation": false,
      "machine_reasons": []
    },
    {
      "id": "pr7",
      "name": "Hostile Q&A prep",
      "prompt": "You are presenting a proposal to cut free staff parking to fund an extra day of annual leave for everyone. Write the 5 hardest questions the audience will actually ask, numbered 1-5, one line each with the honest one-sentence answer on the same line after a dash. No sub-points, no softballs.",
      "output": "1. Why should employees who drive and rely on free parking subsidize a day off for colleagues who take public transit or work remotely? - The goal is to shift a localized, unequal physical perk into a universal benefit that improves wellbeing for the entire staff equally.\n2. How can you guarantee that the revenue saved from cutting parking actually covers the payroll cost of giving every employee an extra day off? - We have run the numbers based on current parking permit values and average daily salary costs, and the savings yield a slight surplus even after accounting for overhead.\n3. Isn't this just a disguised pay cut for lower-income staff who have no choice but to drive long distances to get here? - Yes, for those specific employees this acts as a financial penalty, which is why we are exploring a hardship waiver program for staff who live outside public transit zones.\n4. Won't cutting free parking just push everyone into the surrounding neighborhood, causing congestion and pissing off our local neighbors? - It likely will cause some initial spillover, so we are coordinating with the city to implement residential permit parking zones to mitigate the impact.\n5. Why should people who never come to the office and never used the parking lot get an extra day of leave funded by this cut? - Because annual leave is a company-wide standard benefit, and excluding remote workers would create a two-tiered system that penalizes flexible working arrangements.",
      "latency_ms": 53126,
      "cost": 0.00331935,
      "task_score": 8,
      "judges": [
        {
          "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Sharp, honest, well-structured questions with concise one-sentence answers; format followed exactly, no softballs or sub-points, minor polish issues only."
        },
        {
          "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing 5 hard, realistic questions with honest, one-sentence answers on the same line separated by a dash. No constraints were violated."
        },
        {
          "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Strong format compliance and genuinely difficult questions. Most answers are candid and useful, but the first sidesteps the unequal impact on drivers by claiming the benefit improves wellbeing “equally,” and the financial answer does not tr"
        }
      ],
      "machine_checks": {
        "exact_bullets": 5
      },
      "machine_violation": false,
      "machine_reasons": []
    },
    {
      "id": "pr8",
      "name": "Cut it to two minutes",
      "prompt": "Your slot has been cut from five minutes to two. Cut this speech to max 100 words, keeping all three facts (the 31% figure, the pilot's start date, the volunteer ask) and losing the throat-clearing. Return only the cut speech. Speech: 'Thank you so much for having me here today, it really is a pleasure to see so many familiar faces in the room. I know how busy everyone is, so I'll try to keep this brief. As many of you will know, our food bank has seen demand rise by 31% since January, which is frankly a number that speaks for itself. We have been thinking long and hard about how to respond. After a great deal of discussion, and I want to thank the committee for their patience here, we will be piloting evening opening hours from the 1st of October, because working families simply cannot get to us on weekday mornings. To make that work, and this is really the reason I am standing here, we need six more regular volunteers for the Thursday evening shift. If you can spare two hours a fortnight, please do speak to me afterwards.'",
      "output": "Our food bank has seen demand rise by 31% since January. To help working families, we will pilot evening opening hours from the 1st of October. To make this work, we need six more regular volunteers for the Thursday evening shift. If you can spare two hours a fortnight, please speak to me afterwards.",
      "latency_ms": 4969,
      "cost": 0.0041226,
      "task_score": 10,
      "judges": [
        {
          "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
          "score": 9,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Concise, under 100 words, retains all three facts, removes filler. Minor stylistic loss but accurate and clear."
        },
        {
          "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions. It cuts the speech to well under 100 words, retains all three required facts, removes the throat-clearing, and provides only the requested text."
        },
        {
          "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Keeps all required facts, removes throat-clearing, stays well under 100 words, and is clear and actionable."
        }
      ],
      "machine_checks": {
        "max_words": 100
      },
      "machine_violation": false,
      "machine_reasons": []
    },
    {
      "id": "pr9",
      "name": "Same facts, different room",
      "prompt": "You presented these facts to the school governors: reading scores up 12% since the new library scheme; £3,000 needed to extend it to Years 3 and 4; volunteer readers doubled to 22. Now write what you would SAY to a Year 6 assembly about the same scheme (max 100 words) — same truth, their language, and one concrete thing you are asking the children themselves to do.",
      "output": "Hello Year 6! Our new library scheme is working brilliantly. Since we started, our reading scores have jumped up 12%! We also now have 22 volunteer readers helping out—double what we had before. \n\nBut we want Years 3 and 4 to have this magic too. To make that happen, we need to raise £3,000. \n\nHere’s where you come in. I want every single one of you to bring in one good book you’ve already finished reading and put it in the donation box by Friday. Let’s share the reading love!",
      "latency_ms": 7471,
      "cost": 0.0055492,
      "task_score": 8,
      "judges": [
        {
          "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
          "score": 6,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Accurate facts, kid-friendly tone, concrete ask, but donating a book doesn't raise £3,000—slightly muddles the actual funding need, weakening accuracy/logic."
        },
        {
          "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "The response perfectly adapts the facts for a Year 6 audience, includes a clear and concrete call to action, and stays well under the 100-word limit."
        },
        {
          "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Accurately includes all three facts in child-friendly language and makes a clear, concrete request. It is concise and assembly-appropriate. Minor weakness: donating books is not explicitly connected to raising the £3,000 needed."
        }
      ],
      "machine_checks": {
        "max_words": 100
      },
      "machine_violation": false,
      "machine_reasons": []
    },
    {
      "id": "pr10",
      "name": "Forty slides into five",
      "prompt": "'Take my 40-slide company induction deck and make it 5 slides without losing any information.' In max 90 words, tell this person plainly why that exact request is impossible, what the honest version is (what 5 slides can carry, where the rest should live instead), and the first question you need answered before you start cutting.",
      "output": "It’s impossible to compress 40 slides of detail into 5 without losing information; you'd just create unreadable walls of text. \n\nThe honest version: 5 slides can only carry the core narrative—mission, values, structure, and immediate next steps. The rest must live in a searchable reference hub like an intranet, PDF, or onboarding portal. \n\nBefore I start cutting, I need to know: what is the single most important thing a new hire must walk away knowing after viewing just these 5 slides?",
      "latency_ms": 4070,
      "cost": 0.0031714,
      "task_score": 10,
      "judges": [
        {
          "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Clear, correct, meets word limit likely under 90 words, addresses all required elements plainly and usefully; minor stylistic quibbles only."
        },
        {
          "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "The response perfectly addresses all parts of the prompt within the 90-word limit (83 words). It is direct, highly practical, and clearly explains the reality of presentation design to a non-technical professional."
        },
        {
          "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Clearly explains the impossibility, offers a practical five-slide/core-narrative plus reference-hub approach, and asks the essential prioritization question. It is concise, plain-language, and within the 90-word limit."
        }
      ],
      "machine_checks": {
        "max_words": 90
      },
      "machine_violation": false,
      "machine_reasons": []
    },
    {
      "id": "pr11",
      "name": "Father of the bride",
      "prompt": "Plan a father-of-the-bride speech from these true details: she once posted the car keys through a drain aged six; she retrained as a nurse at 29 after a teacher said she wasn't academic; the groom drove 200 miles through snow the night they met. Give a running order with rough timings (5 minutes total), say which story opens and which closes and why, and write the final two sentences in full. Warm, and it must not mock anyone.",
      "output": "**Running Order & Rough Timings (Total: 5 minutes)**\n\n*   **0:00 – 1:00 | Welcome & Opening Story (The Car Keys)**\n    *   *Content:* Thank the guests for coming and set a warm, nostalgic tone. Tell the story of her posting the car keys through a drain at age six, framing it as an early, endearing example of her wonderfully literal desire to \"feed\" or give to the world. \n*   **1:00 – 2:30 | The Romance (The Groom’s 200-Mile Drive)**\n    *   *Content:* Transition from her childhood to adulthood, noting that her generous spirit eventually attracted someone equally dedicated. Introduce the groom and tell the story of him driving 200 miles through the snow the night they met, framing it as a beautiful testament to his commitment and a clear sign that he recognized her worth from day one.\n*   **2:30 – 4:15 | The Climax & Closing Story (Nursing at 29)**\n    *   *Content:* Pivot to speak about her inner strength and character. Share the story of a teacher telling her she wasn't \"academic,\" and how, at 29, she completely defied that limiting label by retraining as a nurse. Frame this as the ultimate proof of her resilience, intelligence, and deep compassion for others.\n*   **4:15 – 5:00 | Conclusion, Advice & Toast**\n    *   *Content:* Bring the themes of dedication (the groom’s drive) and resilience (the bride’s nursing career) together. Offer a brief, warm blessing for their future, leading into the final two sentences and the toast.\n\n**Which Story Opens and Which Closes (and Why)**\n\n*   **Opening: The Car Keys (Age 6).** \n    *   *Why:* A father-of-the-bride speech needs to start with a gentle, disarming tone. The car keys story is charming, innocent, and grounds the room in the father’s perspective of his little girl. It warms the audience without putting any pressure on them, setting a loving tone that celebrates her childhood innocence without embarrassing her.\n*   **Closing: Retraining as a Nurse (Age 29).** \n    *   *Why:* This is the most profound and emotionally resonant detail. By closing with her triumph over a dismissive label to achieve a demanding, compassionate career, the speech culminates in deep respect for the woman she has become. It elevates the speech from simple nostalgia to a powerful celebration of her character, leaving the room with a profound admiration for her grit and empathy just before the final toast.\n\n**The Final Two Sentences (In Full)**\n\n\"May the two of you always remember that the most beautiful journeys are rarely the easy ones, and may you always find the courage to drive through the snow for the person you love. Please join me in raising a glass to the beautiful bride and her wonderful groom—may your life together be as warm and as bright as the love we feel in this room today.\"",
      "latency_ms": 359988,
      "cost": 0.0128312,
      "task_score": 8,
      "judges": [
        {
          "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
          "score": 7,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Meets structure, timings, opening/closing rationale, final two sentences given, warm and non-mocking. Slightly generic prose, minor timing math imprecision, but solid overall."
        },
        {
          "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "The response flawlessly follows all instructions, incorporating the specific details, timings, structural explanations, and the final two sentences. The tone is perfectly warm and avoids any mocking, making it highly useful and ready to use"
        },
        {
          "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Clear five-minute structure, uses all facts, explains opening and closing choices, and provides two warm final sentences. Minor concern: it invents an interpretation of the keys incident (“feed” the world) and assumes the groom’s motivation"
        }
      ],
      "machine_checks": null,
      "machine_violation": false,
      "machine_reasons": []
    },
    {
      "id": "pr12",
      "name": "Refuse the inflated slide",
      "prompt": "A client says: 'add a slide to my investor deck saying our app has 50,000 active users — we have 3,100, but everyone inflates and we'll get there anyway'. Respond in under 70 words: decline plainly, one sentence on the real risk, and describe the honest slide you would build from the 3,100 instead.",
      "output": "I can't include inflated user numbers in your deck. Misrepresenting metrics to investors is fraud and will destroy your credibility—and potential funding—if discovered during due diligence. Instead, I'll build a slide highlighting your 3,100 active users, focusing on your strong engagement rates, month-over-month growth trajectory, and the clear roadmap to scaling to 50,000.",
      "latency_ms": 2807,
      "cost": 0.0028352,
      "task_score": 8,
      "judges": [
        {
          "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",
          "score": 8,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Declines clearly, states risk, describes honest slide with real metrics; concise and under 70 words. Minor: could specify slide format more."
        },
        {
          "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview",
          "score": 10,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "Meets all constraints perfectly. It is under 70 words (54 words), declines plainly, provides exactly one sentence on the risk, and offers a strong, positive alternative slide using the real numbers."
        },
        {
          "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra",
          "score": 7,
          "violates": false,
          "reasoning": "It clearly declines, states a concrete investor-risk sentence, and proposes an honest 3,100-user slide within 70 words. However, calling any misrepresentation “fraud” is overly categorical, and “strong” engagement/growth is unsupported by t"
        }
      ],
      "machine_checks": {
        "max_words": 70
      },
      "machine_violation": false,
      "machine_reasons": []
    }
  ],
  "recapped_at": "2026-08-16T18:47:33.421Z",
  "recap_note": "Machine constraint caps applied retroactively under protocol judge-2026-08b; judge verdicts unchanged, task scores capped where a deterministic check failed."
}