{ "entity": "gpt-5-3-codex", "entity_type": "model", "category": "CV writing", "suite": "suite-2026-08-tasks4/cv-resume", "model": "openai/gpt-5.3-codex", "judges": [ "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "x-ai/grok-4.5" ], "judge_protocol": "judge-2026-08b", "anchors": "solo-2026-08-a", "score": 93, "caps": 0, "cost_usd": 0.2217, "started_at": "2026-08-16T14:28:46.190Z", "finished_at": "2026-08-16T14:29:21.285Z", "tasks": [ { "id": "cv1", "name": "Profile that mirrors the ad", "prompt": "The job ad: 'Customer Service Team Leader, Bradford, £27,500. You'll lead a team of six handling phone and email queries in a fast-paced environment, own complaint escalations, and report weekly numbers to the ops manager. We want someone customer-obsessed with rock-solid Excel.' The applicant: 4 years at a utilities call centre, 18 months as senior agent covering team-lead shifts, built the team's sickness-cover rota in Excel, 94% complaint resolution rate. Write ONLY the CV personal profile (max 60 words) tailored to this ad — evidence over adjectives, and do not parrot the ad's own phrases: banned 'fast-paced environment', 'customer-obsessed'.", "output": "Utilities contact-centre professional with 4 years’ experience, including 18 months as a senior agent running team-lead shifts. Manage phone and email casework, resolve escalations (94% complaint resolution), and produce clear weekly performance updates. Created and maintained an Excel sickness-cover rota that improved staffing continuity and response times.", "latency_ms": 3178, "cost": 0.0050225, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, evidence-based, avoids banned phrases, concise and relevant; slightly over ideal word count (~55 words, within 60) and lacks explicit leadership framing but strong overall." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions. It is under the 60-word limit (47 words), avoids the banned phrases, and effectively highlights the applicant's relevant experience with concrete evidence tailored to the job ad." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all constraints with evidence-based tailoring under 60 words; minor tense inconsistency only." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 60, "banned": [ "fast-paced environment", "customer-obsessed" ] }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv2", "name": "Untangle the dates", "prompt": "Put this work history into correct reverse-chronological CV order and flag anything a recruiter will query: Greggs, team member, 2016-2018; Openreach, trainee engineer, Jan 2021-present; B&Q, weekend supervisor, 2017-2019; self-employed handyman, 2019-2021 'on and off'. State the overlap you found, the vague period, and write the one honest line you would put under the handyman entry to pre-empt the question.", "output": "Here’s the **correct reverse-chronological order** for your CV:\n\n1. **Openreach** – Trainee Engineer *(Jan 2021–Present)* \n2. **Self-employed Handyman** *(2019–2021, on and off)* \n3. **B&Q** – Weekend Supervisor *(2017–2019)* \n4. **Greggs** – Team Member *(2016–2018)* \n\n### What a recruiter will likely query\n\n- **Overlap 1:** **Greggs (2016–2018)** and **B&Q (2017–2019)** overlap in **2017–2018**. \n - Likely fine if one/both were part-time or weekend work, but they may ask.\n\n- **Overlap 2:** **B&Q (2017–2019)** and **Handyman (2019–2021)** overlap in **2019**. \n - Could be a transition period; still worth clarifying.\n\n- **Overlap 3:** **Handyman (2019–2021)** and **Openreach (from Jan 2021)** overlap in **2021**. \n - Recruiters may ask whether handyman work stopped before or continued alongside Openreach.\n\n- **Vague period:** **“2019–2021 on and off”** is the biggest red flag because it lacks clear months/consistency.\n\n### One honest line to add under the handyman entry\n\n**“Completed ad-hoc handyman jobs intermittently between 2019 and early 2021, with workload varying by client demand and reducing when I started my Openreach role in Jan 2021.”**", "latency_ms": 6275, "cost": 0.0086205, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 6, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Order mostly correct but placing handyman above B&Q breaks strict reverse-chronological order by start date; identifies overlaps reasonably though includes extra ones not asked; honest line is decent but slightly verbose." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, correctly ordering the CV, identifying overlaps and the vague period, and providing a clear, professional line to address the gap/inconsistency." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Correct reverse-chrono order, accurately flags all overlaps and vague period, provides solid pre-emptive line. Minor excess detail on overlaps but fully meets task." } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv3", "name": "Duties into achievements", "prompt": "Rewrite these as CV achievement bullets — exactly 3 bullets, one line each, using ONLY the numbers given, inventing nothing: 1) 'did the fire safety checks' (weekly, 3 buildings, zero failed inspections in 2 years) 2) 'trained new starters' (9 starters, all passed probation) 3) 'looked after the van' (serviced on time, insurance claims down from 3 a year to 0).", "output": "- Conducted weekly fire safety checks across 3 buildings, achieving zero failed inspections over 2 years. \n- Trained 9 new starters, with all passing probation. \n- Managed van servicing on time, reducing insurance claims from 3 a year to 0.", "latency_ms": 3334, "cost": 0.00308875, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, uses only given numbers, exactly 3 bullets one line each, clear and concise for non-technical reader." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing exactly three one-line bullets using only the provided numbers without inventing any details. The phrasing is professional and highly suitable for a CV." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Exact 3 one-line bullets; uses only given numbers with no invention; strong CV phrasing, clear and concise." } ], "machine_checks": { "exact_bullets": 3 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv4", "name": "Thirty years onto two pages", "prompt": "A 52-year-old plant manager has 30 years across 6 employers and his CV runs to 5 pages. In max 120 words, give the ruthless rule set for getting it to 2: what recent roles keep, what pre-2010 roles shrink to, what disappears entirely, and the one thing from 1998 he should KEEP because it still sells him — he commissioned a production line that is still running today.", "output": "**Ruthless 2-page rule set:**\n\n- **Keep in full (last 10–12 years):** 2–3 most recent roles only. For each: title, company, dates, team/budget/plant scale, and 4–6 quantified wins (OEE, downtime, scrap, safety, cost, throughput, on-time delivery, EBITDA impact). \n- **Pre-2010 roles:** compress into a **“Earlier Career”** block: company, title, years, 1 line each (no bullet lists). \n- **Delete entirely:** objective/profile fluff, duplicated responsibilities, obsolete software, old training/certs, references line, and non-managerial early details that don’t prove current plant leadership. \n- **Exception from 1998 (KEEP):** one bullet: **“Commissioned production line in 1998 still operating today”** with output/reliability/payback metrics. That is rare, durable proof of engineering judgment and execution quality.", "latency_ms": 3534, "cost": 0.0039585, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clear, correct, follows format, ruthless rules well-organized, within word limit; useful and concise for non-technical reader, minor formatting could be tighter." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all constraints perfectly. The word count is under 120. The advice is highly actionable, ruthless, and covers all required elements including the specific 1998 exception." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate ruthless rules matching all required elements; under 120 words; clear, concise, highly useful for the busy professional." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 120 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv5", "name": "Profile without the wallpaper", "prompt": "Write a CV personal profile (max 50 words) for a supermarket shift manager: 6 years in post, runs a team of 12, cut waste 15%, trained 4 supervisors. Banned words: 'hard-working', 'team player', 'passionate', 'results-driven'. Every sentence must contain a fact.", "output": "Supermarket Shift Manager with 6 years’ experience leading daily operations and a team of 12 colleagues. Reduced stock and food waste by 15% through tighter controls, and developed 4 supervisors through structured on-shift coaching and performance reviews.", "latency_ms": 3162, "cost": 0.00371175, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Concise, factual, under 50 words, no banned terms, each sentence contains a fact. Minor stylistic nuance but overall excellent." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Perfectly follows all instructions. It includes all required facts, stays well under the 50-word limit (37 words), avoids all banned words, and ensures every sentence contains concrete facts. Highly professional and concise." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets 50-word limit, avoids bans, every sentence has facts, includes all details accurately and concisely." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 50, "banned": [ "hard-working", "team player", "passionate", "results-driven" ] }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv6", "name": "First CV, empty history", "prompt": "Write the honest skeleton of a first CV for a 16-year-old applying for a Saturday job at a garden centre: what the sections are when there are no jobs yet, and what genuinely counts as evidence. Her real life: walks neighbours' dogs for money, runs the school eco club's seedling sales, grade 5 piano. No invented experience, no inflated language — show the actual entries you would write for those three things.", "output": "Great brief. Here’s a **straight, honest first-CV skeleton** for a 16-year-old with no formal jobs yet, plus the **exact kind of entries** I’d write for her real experience.\n\n---\n\n## 1) Sections to include (when there are no formal jobs yet)\n\n1. **Name + Contact details** \n2. **Personal profile** (3–4 plain lines) \n3. **Education** (school, years, predicted/in-progress GCSEs if known) \n4. **Experience** \n - Paid informal work \n - School responsibilities / clubs \n5. **Qualifications & achievements** \n6. **Skills relevant to the job** \n7. **Availability** (important for Saturday role) \n8. **References** (“Available on request” or named school staff member with permission)\n\n---\n\n## 2) What genuinely counts as evidence\n\nFor each entry, include things that can be checked:\n\n- **Dates** (month/year – month/year or “present”) \n- **What you actually did** (specific tasks, not buzzwords) \n- **How often / how many** (e.g., weekly, number of dogs, number of sales events) \n- **Any outcome** (money handled, stock sold, attendance, responsibility level) \n- **Who can verify** (teacher, neighbour/client, music certificate)\n\n---\n\n## 3) Actual CV wording for her three real experiences\n\nYou can copy this style directly.\n\n---\n\n**[Full Name]** \n[Phone] | [Email] | [Town]\n\n### Personal profile\nYear 11 student looking for a Saturday job at a garden centre. Reliable with early starts and regular routines. I already earn money from local dog walking and help run school eco club seedling sales. Interested in plants and practical outdoor work.\n\n### Education\n**[School Name], [Town]** — [Year] to present \nGCSEs in progress (Year 11)\n\n### Experience\n\n**Dog walker (paid), self-employed (local neighbours)** \n[Month Year] – Present \n- Walk dogs for local neighbours before/after school and at weekends. \n- Follow each owner’s instructions for route, timing and handling. \n- Return dogs safely, clean paws when needed, and lock up/return keys as agreed. \n- Arrange times by text and collect payment (cash/bank transfer). \n\n**Evidence:** regular paying clients in local area; messages/payment history; references available from neighbours.\n\n---\n\n**School Eco Club – Seedling sales (student organiser/seller)** \n[Month Year] – Present \n- Help grow seedlings for school eco club sales. \n- Prepare trays, labels and prices for sale days. \n- Help run the stall and speak to students/parents buying plants. \n- Handle cash at the stall and pass totals to supervising teacher. \n\n**Evidence:** can be confirmed by eco club lead teacher; school sale events.\n\n### Qualifications & achievements\n\n**ABRSM Grade 5 Piano** — Passed [Month Year] \n- Practised weekly and prepared for exam performance and theory standard.\n\n**Evidence:** Grade 5 certificate.\n\n### Skills\n- Reliable timekeeping for regular commitments \n- Comfortable speaking politely with adults and customers \n- Basic cash handling and giving change \n- Following written/verbal care instructions carefully \n- Basic seedling care from eco club activities\n\n### Availability\nAvailable Saturdays and school holidays. \n[Optional: Also available after school on X days.]\n\n### References\nAvailable on request. \n[Or: Eco club teacher name, role, school email — only if permission given.]\n\n---\n\nIf you want, I can also format this into a **one-page finished CV layout** (with placeholders she can fill in in 10 minutes).", "latency_ms": 13608, "cost": 0.0178885, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, honest, well-structured, concrete entries matching the three real experiences without inflation. Minor verbosity but clear and useful for a non-technical reader." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly addresses all parts of the prompt. It provides a clear, realistic CV skeleton, explains what counts as evidence, and writes excellent, uninflated entries for the specific experiences provided." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Honest skeleton, clear sections, genuine evidence notes, exact uninflated entries for all three real activities. Minor extra polish only." } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv7", "name": "Back after eight years", "prompt": "A bookkeeper is returning to work after 8 years raising children. Recommend chronological or skills-led for her CV and say why in two sentences. Then write the single matter-of-fact line that goes where the gap sits — no apology — and say which two of these earn a place as evidence the skills stayed alive: treasurer of the PTA (£12k annual budget), ran the Race for Life 10k, completed a Xero online course in 2025, school reading volunteer.", "output": "Use a **skills-led (functional) CV with a brief career timeline**. After an 8-year parenting gap, this format puts your current bookkeeping ability, systems knowledge, and financial responsibility first, so employers assess relevance before dates.\n\n**Gap line (matter-of-fact):** \n**2017–2025: Full-time family care, while maintaining finance capability through voluntary budget management and formal accounting software training.**\n\nThe two strongest pieces of evidence are: \n1. **Treasurer of the PTA (£12k annual budget)** \n2. **Completed a Xero online course in 2025**", "latency_ms": 3028, "cost": 0.00320775, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 6, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Reasonable recommendation with rationale, gap line adequate though embeds evidence rather than purely neutral, correct evidence picks, but only one sentence for reasoning not two, slight deviation from 'no apology' phrasing style." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions. It recommends a skills-led CV with a two-sentence explanation, provides a clear, unapologetic single line for the gap, and correctly identifies the two relevant pieces of evidence." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate recommendation and rationale in two sentences; strong gap line; correctly picks the two skill-relevant items. Minor polish only." } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv8", "name": "Do the hobbies earn their line?", "prompt": "A CV for a trainee veterinary nurse application ends with: 'Interests: socialising with friends, watching films, horse riding, gaming, volunteering at Blue Cross kennels every Sunday, baking.' Say which entries earn their place for THIS job and which to cut, one short reason each, then rewrite the line as it should appear.", "output": "For a **trainee veterinary nurse** CV:\n\n- **Socialising with friends** — **Cut**: too generic and adds no job-relevant evidence. \n- **Watching films** — **Cut**: passive hobby, not relevant to veterinary nursing skills. \n- **Horse riding** — **Keep**: shows confidence around animals and practical handling experience. \n- **Gaming** — **Cut**: not relevant unless tied to a specific skill (e.g., competitive leadership). \n- **Volunteering at Blue Cross kennels every Sunday** — **Keep**: directly proves commitment to animal welfare and hands-on care. \n- **Baking** — **Cut**: fine personally, but weaker than animal-related points when space is limited.\n\n**Rewritten line:**\n\n**Interests:** Volunteering at Blue Cross kennels every Sunday; horse riding.", "latency_ms": 4897, "cost": 0.00586775, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, follows instructions well with reasons and rewrite; concise and useful, though slightly formulaic phrasing." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions. It accurately identifies which interests to keep and cut for a veterinary role, provides concise and logical reasons for each, and offers a clean, professional rewrite." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate keep/cut decisions with apt short reasons; clean rewrite prioritizes job-relevant items perfectly." } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv9", "name": "Fix the format", "prompt": "A CV arrives as: two-column layout with dates in the left column, name in WordArt, a selfie top-right, 9pt Calibri to squeeze 2 pages, skills shown as star-ratings out of 5, filename CV_final_FINAL(2).docx. List exactly 5 fixes as bullets, one line each, most damaging problem first. No sub-points.", "output": "- Remove the WordArt name and selfie, and use a plain text header with your name and contact details for a professional first impression. \n- Convert the two-column design (including date sidebar) to a single-column ATS-friendly layout so parsing and readability don’t break. \n- Increase body text from 9pt to at least 10.5–11pt and trim weak content instead of compressing two pages. \n- Replace 5-star skill ratings with specific proficiency evidence (tools, years, outcomes, certifications) to avoid subjective scoring. \n- Rename the file to a clean professional format like `FirstName_LastName_CV.docx` instead of `CV_final_FINAL(2).docx`.", "latency_ms": 3476, "cost": 0.00447475, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Correctly addresses all issues, ordered reasonably, concise bullets, no sub-points. Minor debate on prioritization order but solid, useful, accurate response." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing exactly 5 single-line bullets with no sub-points. The advice is highly accurate, practical, and prioritized logically for a professional context." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Exact 5 one-line bullets, prioritized correctly, fully addresses all CV issues with professional advice." } ], "machine_checks": { "exact_bullets": 5 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv10", "name": "The Excel question", "prompt": "'I use Excel a bit — sums, sorting, the odd chart. Can I put advanced Excel on my CV? The job asks for it.' In max 80 words: where the honest line is, the exact wording you WOULD use for their real level, and the one-weekend fix (pivot tables plus lookups) that would let them truthfully claim more.", "output": "Honest line: if you’d struggle to do it live in an interview, don’t claim it. \nWording now: **“Excel: intermediate (SUM/IF, sorting/filtering, basic charts); currently developing advanced skills.”** \nOne‑weekend upgrade: learn and practice **PivotTables** (summaries, grouping, slicers) and **lookups** (**XLOOKUP** or **INDEX/MATCH**) on a small dataset, then build one mini dashboard. \nAfter that, you can truthfully write: **“Excel: strong intermediate, including PivotTables and lookup functions.”**", "latency_ms": 2355, "cost": 0.002814, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, honest, concise, follows instructions well; slightly over structure but within word limit and covers all required elements clearly." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Perfectly addresses all three requirements within the 80-word limit. The advice is highly practical, accurate, and perfectly tailored for a non-technical professional." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate honest advice, exact CV wording, and weekend fix as required. Under 80 words, clear and useful for non-technical user." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 80 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv11", "name": "Strip the header", "prompt": "A UK CV header reads: 'Marion Wray, 14 Sycamore Grove, Dudley DY2 8TT. Date of birth 12/03/1971. Married, 2 children. NI: QQ123456C. Full clean driving licence.' Say what stays, what goes and why — what a UK employer does not need and should not be handed — then rewrite the header as it should appear, adding anything missing that SHOULD be there.", "output": "Great question — this is exactly the kind of CV clean-up that protects privacy and avoids bias.\n\n## What stays, what goes (and why)\n\n### ✅ Keep\n- **Name**: *Marion Wray* \n - Essential identification.\n- **Location (broad)**: e.g. *Dudley, West Midlands* \n - Employers need to know rough commute area, not your full postal address.\n\n### ➕ Add (missing but should be there)\n- **Mobile number**\n- **Professional email address**\n- **LinkedIn URL** (optional but recommended if current/relevant)\n\n### ❌ Remove\n- **Full street address + full postcode** \n - Not needed at application stage; unnecessary personal data.\n- **Date of birth** \n - Not required and can invite age bias (protected characteristic under Equality Act 2010).\n- **Marital status / children** \n - Not relevant to ability to do the job; also protected-characteristic territory.\n- **NI number** \n - Highly sensitive; only needed by payroll after offer/onboarding.\n- **“Full clean driving licence”** \n - Keep only if driving is genuinely required for the role; otherwise remove from header.\n\n---\n\n## Rewritten header (best practice)\n\n**Marion Wray** \nDudley, West Midlands \n07xxx xxx xxx | marion.wray@email.com | linkedin.com/in/marionwray\n\nIf the role requires travel/driving, you can add a final line:\n\n**Full UK driving licence**\n\n(Or place that in an “Additional Information” section instead of the header.)", "latency_ms": 6610, "cost": 0.00941675, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, well-structured, correctly flags Equality Act concerns, gives practical rewrite. Minor: could mention town/postcode area convention differently, but overall strong and useful." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly addresses all parts of the prompt. It accurately identifies what to keep, remove, and add based on UK CV best practices and anti-discrimination laws, and provides a clean, professional rewrite." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate UK CV advice on privacy/bias; clear keep/remove/add with reasons; solid rewrite. Minor polish only." } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv12", "name": "Refuse the invented job", "prompt": "'There's an 11-month gap in 2023 I don't want to explain. Invent a short contract at a company that's gone bust — nobody can check.' The truth: he was a full-time carer for his father. Respond in under 70 words: decline plainly, one sentence on how the invention unravels, and the honest one-line gap entry you would write instead.", "output": "I can’t help fabricate employment history. Fake contracts usually unravel when references, payroll/tax records, or insolvency administrators can’t confirm details. Use this one-line entry instead: **“Jan–Nov 2023 — Full-time carer for my father (family caregiving responsibilities), now resolved and available for full-time work.”**", "latency_ms": 3396, "cost": 0.004585, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Declines clearly, explains unraveling, gives honest one-line entry, under 70 words. Meets all instructions well." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions. It plainly declines the request, provides exactly one sentence explaining how the lie unravels, and offers a highly effective, honest one-line resume entry, all well under the 70-word limit." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all constraints exactly under 70 words; declines plainly, explains unravel risk, provides honest gap entry. Flawless." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 70 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] } ], "recapped_at": "2026-08-16T18:47:33.544Z", "recap_note": "Machine constraint caps applied retroactively under protocol judge-2026-08b; judge verdicts unchanged, task scores capped where a deterministic check failed." }