{ "entity": "gpt-5-6-luna", "entity_type": "model", "category": "Presentations", "suite": "suite-2026-08-tasks4/presentations", "model": "openai/gpt-5.6-luna", "judges": [ "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "x-ai/grok-4.5" ], "judge_protocol": "judge-2026-08b", "anchors": "solo-2026-08-a", "score": 98, "caps": 0, "cost_usd": 0.138, "started_at": "2026-08-16T14:12:41.872Z", "finished_at": "2026-08-16T14:13:14.540Z", "tasks": [ { "id": "pr1", "name": "Deck from a standing start", "prompt": "Plan a 10-minute presentation to the parish council proposing a zebra crossing outside St Mary's Primary. You have: 2 near-misses reported this term, a 140-signature petition, and an estimated £24,000 cost. Outline 8 slides — for each give a short title and the one point that slide must land. The ask (a feasibility study, not the money) must arrive by slide 3, not the end.", "output": "| Slide | Short title | One point it must land | Suggested time |\n|---|---|---|---:|\n| 1 | **A Risk at the School Gate** | Crossing St Mary’s Primary’s entrance is a daily safety concern for children, families and drivers. | 1:00 |\n| 2 | **The Evidence Locally** | This is not hypothetical: there have been **2 reported near-misses this term**, supported by a **140-signature petition**. | 1:15 |\n| 3 | **The Ask: Approve a Feasibility Study** | The parish council should formally support commissioning a study into a zebra crossing outside the school—not fund construction at this stage. | 1:15 |\n| 4 | **What the Study Would Establish** | A feasibility study would assess the safest location, visibility, traffic conditions, accessibility and required approvals. | 1:15 |\n| 5 | **A Proportionate Solution** | A zebra crossing could provide a clear, familiar priority point for pedestrians while giving drivers an unambiguous warning. | 1:15 |\n| 6 | **The Likely Cost** | The current construction estimate is approximately **£24,000**, but the study will test that estimate and identify possible funding routes. | 1:15 |\n| 7 | **A Clear, Low-Risk Process** | The council can make progress without committing to the full cost: study first, review findings, then decide whether to pursue delivery. | 1:15 |\n| 8 | **Decision Needed Today** | Approve the feasibility study, nominate a council contact, and request a report back with the design, cost, funding and approval options. | 1:30 |\n\nThis places the decision request early, while leaving the remaining slides to explain why it is sensible and proportionate.", "latency_ms": 5036, "cost": 0.0003365, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all constraints: 8 slides, ask by slide 3, uses given evidence and cost, clear one-point structure, concise and practical for a non-technical council audience." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, including the specific constraints (8 slides, ask by slide 3, specific data points included). It is clear, concise, and highly useful for a non-technical professional." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all requirements: 8 slides, ask by slide 3, uses given facts, clear titles and single points. Minor extra time column is harmless." } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr2", "name": "Speaker notes, not an essay", "prompt": "Write the speaker notes (max 120 words) for a single slide titled 'Why we lost the Henderson account'. Facts: response times slipped from 4 hours to 2 days over six months; the client flagged it twice; a competitor promised same-day. The notes must sound like a person talking, admit the failure plainly, and set up the next slide, which is the fix. Return only the notes.", "output": "We lost the Henderson account because our response times deteriorated—from four hours to two days over six months. The client flagged the issue twice, and we still didn’t correct it. Meanwhile, a competitor promised same-day service, giving Henderson a clear reason to move. This was our failure: we saw the warning signs and didn’t act quickly enough. The next slide lays out the fix—how we’ll restore response-time discipline and prevent this from happening again.", "latency_ms": 2193, "cost": 0.0000965, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 7, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, admits failure, sets up next slide, conversational tone but slightly formal. Within word count. Good clarity and usefulness." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions. It includes all required facts, adopts a natural speaking tone, plainly admits the failure, sets up the next slide, stays well under the 120-word limit, and includes no extra text." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all facts, tone, setup, and word limit perfectly; natural spoken style with plain admission." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 120 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr3", "name": "One slide, not a memo", "prompt": "Turn this paragraph into ONE slide: a headline of max 8 words, then max 4 bullets. Paragraph: 'Following an extensive review of our logistics operations, the board has decided to relocate the central warehouse from the Norwich site to a larger facility outside Peterborough. The move is scheduled for the first week of March and is expected to reduce average delivery times to our northern customers by around a day and a half. There will be no redundancies: all fourteen warehouse staff have been offered relocation packages or transfers to the Norwich retail branch. Customers should see no disruption, as the two sites will run in parallel for a fortnight during the changeover.'", "output": "# Central Warehouse Relocating to Peterborough\n\n- Move scheduled for the first week of March \n- Larger facility expected to cut northern delivery times by ~1.5 days \n- No redundancies: all 14 staff offered relocation packages or Norwich retail transfers \n- Sites will operate in parallel for two weeks to avoid customer disruption", "latency_ms": 3623, "cost": 0.0001156, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Concise headline (5 words), 4 accurate bullets capturing key facts, clear formatting suitable for a slide, meets constraints well." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing a concise headline under 8 words and exactly 4 accurate, clear bullet points that capture all key information for a non-technical professional." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate condensation meeting exact limits; minor simplification of 'outside Peterborough' and 'fortnight' still fully usable and clear." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_bullets": 4 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr4", "name": "The first 30 seconds", "prompt": "Write the spoken opening (max 80 words) of a careers-evening talk to 40 sixth-formers about plumbing apprenticeships. It must earn attention in the first sentence with something concrete from these true facts: day-one pay £15k rising to £32k qualified; a Christmas Day callout; zero student debt. It must not begin with 'Hello' or 'Good evening' and must not introduce the speaker — banned phrase: 'my name is'.", "output": "On day one of a plumbing apprenticeship, you can earn £15,000—and, once qualified, that can rise to £32,000. You could be called out on Christmas Day, solving a problem when a family really needs you. And unlike university, you can build a skilled career without student debt. Tonight, let’s look at what that route involves, what you’ll learn, and why plumbing is far more than fixing a dripping tap.", "latency_ms": 5443, "cost": 0.0003076, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets constraints, opens strong with concrete pay fact, avoids banned phrases, concise; under 80 words. Minor stylistic polish possible." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions. It meets the word count, avoids the banned greetings and phrases, and immediately grabs attention using the provided facts. The tone is engaging and highly appropriate for the target audience" }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all constraints: 69 words, opens with concrete pay fact, covers all three facts, bans observed, clear and engaging for audience." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 80, "banned": [ "my name is" ] }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr5", "name": "Slide on a diet", "prompt": "This slide is for a 5-minute update to the senior team. Cut it to the bullets that help them DECIDE something — max 4 bullets, nothing else added. Slide 'Office move update': - Project kicked off on 4 June as agreed - Weekly meetings have been held every Tuesday - The project team has worked very hard - Three sites shortlisted, all within 2 miles of the station - Broadband installation lead time is 6 weeks, which is now the critical path - We looked at many options for furniture - Costs are tracking 8% under the £90k budget - The tone of meetings has been very positive - Decision needed by 30 September or we lose the preferred site.", "output": "- Three sites shortlisted, all within 2 miles of the station.\n- Broadband installation takes 6 weeks and is now the critical path.\n- Costs are tracking 8% under the £90k budget.\n- Select a site by 30 September to retain the preferred option.", "latency_ms": 2803, "cost": 0.0001046, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Correctly selects 4 decision-relevant bullets, omits fluff, meets constraint, clear and concise, useful for senior decision-making." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing exactly four highly relevant bullets that strip away fluff and focus purely on the information needed for the senior team to make a decision. No extra text was added." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Exactly 4 decision-focused bullets drawn from source; no extras; clear, accurate, and useful for seniors." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_bullets": 4 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr6", "name": "Right chart, right headline", "prompt": "A slide must show these figures: complaints per month — Jan 42, Feb 44, Mar 41, Apr 78, May 80, Jun 83. The April jump coincided with a new phone system. Say which chart type you would use and why (one sentence), write the slide headline as a FINDING (not 'Complaints data'), and name the one annotation you would add to the chart itself.", "output": "- **Chart type:** A line chart, because it clearly shows the month-to-month trend and the sharp break in April. \n- **Headline:** **Complaints nearly doubled in April and remained elevated through June, coinciding with the new phone system.** \n- **Chart annotation:** **New phone system introduced — April**.", "latency_ms": 4900, "cost": 0.0001629, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all requirements: chart type with rationale, finding-based headline, single annotation. Clear, concise, accurate given data." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing a clear chart recommendation in one sentence, an insightful finding-based headline, and the exact necessary annotation. It is concise and highly useful." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Perfectly meets all requirements: correct chart choice with one-sentence rationale, finding-style headline, and precise annotation." } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr7", "name": "Hostile Q&A prep", "prompt": "You are presenting a proposal to cut free staff parking to fund an extra day of annual leave for everyone. Write the 5 hardest questions the audience will actually ask, numbered 1-5, one line each with the honest one-sentence answer on the same line after a dash. No sub-points, no softballs.", "output": "1. **How much will this actually cost staff who currently rely on free parking?** — It will be a real pay cut for regular parkers, and the extra leave will not fully offset that cost for everyone. \n2. **Why should people who do not drive receive the same extra leave as those who lose parking?** — Because the proposal is a workforce-wide benefit funded by a targeted change, though that distribution will feel unfair to some drivers. \n3. **Do parking charges genuinely raise enough money to fund an extra day of leave?** — Only if usage, pricing, enforcement, and administration produce sufficient net revenue, so the exact funding gap must be published before approval. \n4. **What happens to staff who have no practical alternative to driving?** — They would need exemptions, subsidies, car-sharing, or other support, otherwise the policy would disproportionately penalise them. \n5. **What will stop this becoming the first step toward wider reductions in staff benefits?** — Nothing guarantees that, so the proposal needs a ring-fenced commitment that parking income funds leave rather than general spending.", "latency_ms": 4007, "cost": 0.0002208, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 7, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Good hard questions with honest answers on same line; bolding adds slight formatting deviation but follows structure and is concise and useful." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response follows all instructions perfectly, providing 5 hard questions with honest, one-sentence answers on the same line separated by a dash. The content is highly relevant, realistic, and concise." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Perfect format match; hard honest Q&A pairs; fully useful, clear, concise." } ], "machine_checks": { "exact_bullets": 5 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr8", "name": "Cut it to two minutes", "prompt": "Your slot has been cut from five minutes to two. Cut this speech to max 100 words, keeping all three facts (the 31% figure, the pilot's start date, the volunteer ask) and losing the throat-clearing. Return only the cut speech. Speech: 'Thank you so much for having me here today, it really is a pleasure to see so many familiar faces in the room. I know how busy everyone is, so I'll try to keep this brief. As many of you will know, our food bank has seen demand rise by 31% since January, which is frankly a number that speaks for itself. We have been thinking long and hard about how to respond. After a great deal of discussion, and I want to thank the committee for their patience here, we will be piloting evening opening hours from the 1st of October, because working families simply cannot get to us on weekday mornings. To make that work, and this is really the reason I am standing here, we need six more regular volunteers for the Thursday evening shift. If you can spare two hours a fortnight, please do speak to me afterwards.'", "output": "Demand at our food bank has risen 31% since January. To better serve working families who cannot reach us on weekday mornings, we’ll pilot evening opening hours starting 1 October. To make this possible, we need six more regular volunteers for Thursday evening shifts. If you can spare two hours a fortnight, please speak to me afterwards.", "latency_ms": 1738, "cost": 0.0000891, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Concise, keeps all three facts, under 100 words, removes throat-clearing, clear and professional." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly cuts the speech to 57 words, retains all three required facts, removes the throat-clearing, and includes no extra text." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "All three facts retained accurately; throat-clearing removed; 53 words; only the speech returned." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 100 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr9", "name": "Same facts, different room", "prompt": "You presented these facts to the school governors: reading scores up 12% since the new library scheme; £3,000 needed to extend it to Years 3 and 4; volunteer readers doubled to 22. Now write what you would SAY to a Year 6 assembly about the same scheme (max 100 words) — same truth, their language, and one concrete thing you are asking the children themselves to do.", "output": "Year 6, our new library reading scheme is making a real difference: reading scores have risen by 12%. More people are getting involved too—our volunteer readers have doubled to 22. We want Years 3 and 4 to benefit as well, but extending the scheme will cost £3,000. You can help right now: choose a book you love, write a short recommendation for it, and add it to our “Year 6 Must-Reads” display. Your suggestions could inspire younger pupils to discover great books and become confident readers too.", "latency_ms": 3460, "cost": 0.0001502, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, kid-friendly, includes concrete ask, within word limit; misses direct fundraising angle but consistent with facts and instructions." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly adapts the facts for a Year 6 audience, includes a clear and concrete call to action, and strictly adheres to the word count limit." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "All facts accurate, under 100 words, age-appropriate language, clear concrete ask for children. Flawless match to brief." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 100 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr10", "name": "Forty slides into five", "prompt": "'Take my 40-slide company induction deck and make it 5 slides without losing any information.' In max 90 words, tell this person plainly why that exact request is impossible, what the honest version is (what 5 slides can carry, where the rest should live instead), and the first question you need answered before you start cutting.", "output": "You can’t fit all 40 slides’ information into five without losing detail, context, or usability. The honest version is: create five slides carrying the essential story, decisions, expectations, and next actions; move supporting detail, policies, examples, references, and compliance content into an appendix, handbook, or linked source. Before cutting, I need to know: **Who is the audience, and what must they understand or do after the five-slide version?**", "latency_ms": 2827, "cost": 0.0001149, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clear, plain explanation, honest version, and question included; concise, within word limit, meets task requirements well." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly addresses all parts of the prompt within the 90-word limit. It is direct, highly practical for a professional, and clearly explains the reality of the request while offering a constructive solution." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets 90-word limit; plainly explains impossibility, honest 5-slide scope plus rest location, and needed question. Flawless on all criteria." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 90 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr11", "name": "Father of the bride", "prompt": "Plan a father-of-the-bride speech from these true details: she once posted the car keys through a drain aged six; she retrained as a nurse at 29 after a teacher said she wasn't academic; the groom drove 200 miles through snow the night they met. Give a running order with rough timings (5 minutes total), say which story opens and which closes and why, and write the final two sentences in full. Warm, and it must not mock anyone.", "output": "## Five-minute running order\n\n### 1. Welcome and welcome to the groom — 0:00–0:35\n- Thank everyone for coming.\n- Say how proud and happy you are to be celebrating your daughter and [groom’s name].\n- Establish the theme: she has always been determined, resourceful and wholehearted.\n\n### 2. Opening story: the car keys — 0:35–1:20\n**Open with this story.**\n\n- Tell how, aged six, she once posted the car keys through a drain.\n- Keep it affectionate rather than presenting it as mischief: it is an early glimpse of someone who has always acted decisively—even if the destination was occasionally unexpected.\n- Link it to her lifelong character: resourceful, independent and capable of turning an unusual situation into a story everyone remembers.\n\n**Why it opens:** It is a vivid, short, gently funny image that immediately makes the bride feel real and lovable, while giving the speech a warm and relaxed beginning.\n\n### 3. Her determination: retraining as a nurse — 1:20–2:25\n- Explain that at 29 she chose to retrain as a nurse.\n- Mention that a teacher had once told her she was not academic, but avoid making the teacher the target; focus instead on how she responded.\n- Emphasise the courage, discipline and compassion involved in starting again and choosing a demanding profession.\n- Say that becoming a nurse showed not only intelligence, but also kindness and a willingness to care for others.\n\nPossible link: \n“Those car keys may have gone down a drain, but her determination has never gone anywhere except forward.”\n\n### 4. Welcome the groom and tell the meeting story — 2:25–3:25\n- Turn to [groom’s name] and say how pleased you are that he is now part of the family.\n- Tell how, on the night they met, he drove 200 miles through snow to see her.\n- Present it as evidence of commitment and courage, while keeping the tone warm rather than dramatic: from the beginning, he was willing to make a considerable effort to be with her.\n- Add that what matters most is not just that journey, but the many ordinary acts of care and support that have followed it.\n\n### 5. The couple and what you wish for them — 3:25–4:25\n- Say that the bride’s determination and the groom’s devotion complement one another.\n- Speak briefly about the qualities you see in their relationship: warmth, resilience, trust and the ability to keep choosing each other.\n- Offer one sincere wish: that they continue to face life as a team, with humour, patience and generosity.\n\n### 6. Toast — 4:25–5:00\n- Thank the guests, and perhaps acknowledge both families.\n- Invite everyone to raise their glasses.\n- End with the snow journey rather than another joke, so the speech finishes on a romantic and memorable note.\n\n**Why this story closes:** It brings the focus fully onto the couple and ends with a clear image of love making the effort to cross a difficult distance. It leaves the room with affection rather than laughter alone.\n\n### Final two sentences of the speech\n\n“So please raise your glasses to two people who have shown us that the best journeys are the ones we make together, whatever the weather. To [bride’s name] and [groom’s name]—may your life together be full of love, courage, kindness and many happy miles ahead.”", "latency_ms": 11090, "cost": 0.0007553, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all constraints: running order, timings, opens/closes identified with rationale, final two sentences given, warm, non-mocking. Minor: total sums to 5:00 correctly, well structured, slightly formulaic but strong overall." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, including the specific details, timings, opening/closing story explanations, and the final two sentences. The tone is warm and explicitly avoids mocking." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Complete, warm plan with exact required elements, timings, open/close rationale, and final sentences; minor polish only." } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr12", "name": "Refuse the inflated slide", "prompt": "A client says: 'add a slide to my investor deck saying our app has 50,000 active users — we have 3,100, but everyone inflates and we'll get there anyway'. Respond in under 70 words: decline plainly, one sentence on the real risk, and describe the honest slide you would build from the 3,100 instead.", "output": "I can’t help present 50,000 active users when you have 3,100. That misrepresentation could undermine investor trust and create legal and diligence risks. I’d build an honest slide showing 3,100 active users, defining “active,” highlighting growth trends, retention, engagement, acquisition efficiency, and a credible roadmap toward 50,000.", "latency_ms": 1967, "cost": 0.0000535, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clear decline, risk stated, honest slide described concisely; meets word limit and structure well, minor room for polish." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, stays well under the word limit, declines plainly, includes exactly one sentence on the risk, and offers a strong, honest alternative slide." }, { "judge": "x-ai/grok-4.5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets word limit and structure exactly; declines clearly, states risk, proposes honest slide. Accurate, useful, concise." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 70 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] } ], "recapped_at": "2026-08-16T18:47:33.894Z", "recap_note": "Machine constraint caps applied retroactively under protocol judge-2026-08b; judge verdicts unchanged, task scores capped where a deterministic check failed." }