{ "entity": "mistral-medium-3-5", "entity_type": "model", "category": "CV writing", "suite": "suite-2026-08-tasks4/cv-resume", "model": "mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5", "judges": [ "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "openai/gpt-5.6-terra" ], "judge_protocol": "judge-2026-08b", "anchors": "solo-2026-08-a", "score": 78, "caps": 0, "cost_usd": 0.1581, "started_at": "2026-08-16T14:39:13.837Z", "finished_at": "2026-08-16T14:39:36.549Z", "tasks": [ { "id": "cv1", "name": "Profile that mirrors the ad", "prompt": "The job ad: 'Customer Service Team Leader, Bradford, £27,500. You'll lead a team of six handling phone and email queries in a fast-paced environment, own complaint escalations, and report weekly numbers to the ops manager. We want someone customer-obsessed with rock-solid Excel.' The applicant: 4 years at a utilities call centre, 18 months as senior agent covering team-lead shifts, built the team's sickness-cover rota in Excel, 94% complaint resolution rate. Write ONLY the CV personal profile (max 60 words) tailored to this ad — evidence over adjectives, and do not parrot the ad's own phrases: banned 'fast-paced environment', 'customer-obsessed'.", "output": "Senior call centre agent with 18 months covering team-lead shifts. Built Excel sickness-cover rota, improving shift coverage. Achieved 94% complaint resolution rate. Led team of six, handling phone and email queries, escalating complaints. Reported weekly performance numbers to management.", "latency_ms": 711, "cost": 0.0007065, "task_score": 6, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Concise, evidence-based, within word limit, avoids banned phrases. Slightly choppy/list-like phrasing reduces polish, but strong overall fit to ad and applicant details." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 3, "violates": true, "reasoning": "Violates the 'do not parrot' constraint by copying 'team of six, handling phone and email queries'. It also hallucinates by claiming the applicant already performed the exact duties of the target role instead of using their actual experienc" }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 6, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Concise and within 60 words, using strong evidence and avoiding banned phrases. However, it presents leading a team of six, phone/email handling, and weekly reporting as established experience when those details were only in the advert, not" } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 60, "banned": [ "fast-paced environment", "customer-obsessed" ] }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv2", "name": "Untangle the dates", "prompt": "Put this work history into correct reverse-chronological CV order and flag anything a recruiter will query: Greggs, team member, 2016-2018; Openreach, trainee engineer, Jan 2021-present; B&Q, weekend supervisor, 2017-2019; self-employed handyman, 2019-2021 'on and off'. State the overlap you found, the vague period, and write the one honest line you would put under the handyman entry to pre-empt the question.", "output": "Here’s the corrected reverse-chronological order with flags for a recruiter:\n\n1. **Openreach**, Trainee Engineer, *Jan 2021–Present*\n2. **Self-employed handyman**, *2019–2021* (on and off)\n3. **B&Q**, Weekend Supervisor, *2017–2019*\n4. **Greggs**, Team Member, *2016–2018*\n\n### **Flags for a recruiter:**\n- **Overlap:** B&Q (2017–2019) and Greggs (2016–2018) overlap for **2017–2018** (1 year).\n- **Vague period:** \"On and off\" for the handyman role (2019–2021) lacks clarity on exact dates or consistency.\n\n### **Honest line to pre-empt questions under handyman entry:**\n*\"Flexible self-employment alongside other commitments, with variable workloads.\"*", "latency_ms": 1840, "cost": 0.0019425, "task_score": 6, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 6, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Correct ordering and overlap identified, but overlap analysis omitted B&Q/Openreach transition gap; the honest line is vague, not the frank pre-emptive explanation requested." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, correctly ordering the CV, identifying the overlap and vague period, and providing a clear, professional line to pre-empt recruiter questions." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 5, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Order is correct and it flags the vague handyman period, but it misses stated 2019 overlap with B&Q and potential 2021 overlap with Openreach. The proposed handyman line is honest-sounding but too vague to fully pre-empt recruiter questions" } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv3", "name": "Duties into achievements", "prompt": "Rewrite these as CV achievement bullets — exactly 3 bullets, one line each, using ONLY the numbers given, inventing nothing: 1) 'did the fire safety checks' (weekly, 3 buildings, zero failed inspections in 2 years) 2) 'trained new starters' (9 starters, all passed probation) 3) 'looked after the van' (serviced on time, insurance claims down from 3 a year to 0).", "output": "- Conducted weekly fire safety checks across 3 buildings with zero failed inspections in 2 years.\n- Trained 9 new starters, all of whom passed probation.\n- Maintained van servicing schedule, reducing insurance claims from 3 a year to 0.", "latency_ms": 548, "cost": 0.000591, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Exactly 3 bullets, one line each, uses only given numbers, accurate, concise, professional CV style." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing exactly 3 concise, one-line CV bullets using only the provided numbers and facts without inventing anything." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clear, concise, and accurately uses all supplied figures in exactly three one-line bullets. Minor issue: “reducing insurance claims” implies the servicing directly caused the reduction, whereas the source only states both facts." } ], "machine_checks": { "exact_bullets": 3 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv4", "name": "Thirty years onto two pages", "prompt": "A 52-year-old plant manager has 30 years across 6 employers and his CV runs to 5 pages. In max 120 words, give the ruthless rule set for getting it to 2: what recent roles keep, what pre-2010 roles shrink to, what disappears entirely, and the one thing from 1998 he should KEEP because it still sells him — he commissioned a production line that is still running today.", "output": "**Ruthless CV Edit Rules:**\n\n1. **Keep:** Last 10 years (2014–2024) in detail—roles, achievements, metrics.\n2. **Shrink:** Pre-2010 roles to 1–2 lines each (job title, company, *one* key responsibility).\n3. **Delete:** Irrelevant early roles (e.g., entry-level, non-managerial), redundant skills, outdated tech.\n4. **Keep the 1998 win:** *\"Commissioned [X] production line (1998)—still operational today, saving [Y] annually.\"* Proof of longevity/impact.\n\n**Format:** Bullet points, no fluff. Prioritize leadership, cost savings, efficiency gains. Cut to 2 pages by axing filler, not value.", "latency_ms": 2077, "cost": 0.001491, "task_score": 7, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 6, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Reasonable and on-topic but timeframe inconsistent (2014 vs pre-2010 gap), slightly exceeds concise clarity, likely near/at 120 words. Covers required elements adequately." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Hits all constraints perfectly. Word count is ~85 words (under the 120 limit). Addresses recent roles, pre-2010 roles, deletions, and the specific 1998 production line achievement. Highly actionable and concise." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 7, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clear, concise, and covers the requested 1998 achievement. However, it leaves 2010–2013 unaddressed, uses potentially stale 2014–2024 dates, and suggests an unprovided annual-savings claim. Pre-2010 entries should emphasize one achievement," } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 120 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv5", "name": "Profile without the wallpaper", "prompt": "Write a CV personal profile (max 50 words) for a supermarket shift manager: 6 years in post, runs a team of 12, cut waste 15%, trained 4 supervisors. Banned words: 'hard-working', 'team player', 'passionate', 'results-driven'. Every sentence must contain a fact.", "output": "**Experienced supermarket shift manager with 6 years’ leadership.** Manages a team of 12, reducing waste by 15%. Trained 4 supervisors to improve operations. Ensures smooth daily store performance.", "latency_ms": 686, "cost": 0.0004815, "task_score": 5, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 5, "violates": true, "reasoning": "Last sentence lacks a specific fact, breaking the 'every sentence must contain a fact' rule; otherwise concise, accurate, no banned words." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 5, "violates": true, "reasoning": "The response includes all required metrics and avoids banned words. However, it violates the constraint that every sentence must contain a fact, as the final sentence is a subjective claim rather than a concrete fact." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets the 50-word limit, avoids all banned words, and includes the key facts. The final sentence is vague and less evidence-based than the others, while “reducing waste” is slightly awkward tense, but the profile is clear and usable." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 50, "banned": [ "hard-working", "team player", "passionate", "results-driven" ] }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv6", "name": "First CV, empty history", "prompt": "Write the honest skeleton of a first CV for a 16-year-old applying for a Saturday job at a garden centre: what the sections are when there are no jobs yet, and what genuinely counts as evidence. Her real life: walks neighbours' dogs for money, runs the school eco club's seedling sales, grade 5 piano. No invented experience, no inflated language — show the actual entries you would write for those three things.", "output": "Here’s a simple, honest CV skeleton for a 16-year-old applying for a Saturday job at a garden centre. It sticks to real experience, uses plain language, and avoids padding.\n\n---\n\n**Name**\n[Your Address]\n[Your Phone Number]\n[Your Email]\n\n---\n\n### **Education**\n[School Name] – [Year Group, e.g., Year 11]\n*Relevant subjects:* [e.g., Biology, Geography] – if studying any that link to plants/environment.\n\n---\n\n### **Work Experience**\n*(No formal jobs yet, so list paid or regular responsibilities that show reliability, customer service, or practical skills.)*\n\n**Dog Walker** | [Neighbourhood/Street] | [Start Date] – Present\n- Walked dogs for [number] local families, 1–2 times a week.\n- Collected payment, followed owners’ instructions (e.g., routes, feeding).\n- Trusted with keys to homes on [X] occasions.\n\n**School Eco Club – Seedling Sales Organiser** | [School Name] | [Start Date] – Present\n- Grew and sold seedlings (e.g., herbs, tomatoes) to students/parents at school events.\n- Handled cash, counted stock, and promoted sales to raise £[X] for club projects.\n\n---\n\n### **Skills**\n- **Practical:** Basic plant care (from seedling sales), handling money, timekeeping.\n- **Customer-facing:** Friendly with dog owners, answered questions about seedlings at sales.\n- **Other:** Grade 5 Piano (shows discipline, but only include if space allows—prioritise relevant skills).\n\n---\n### **References**\nAvailable on request (e.g., a neighbour who hired you for dog walking, or a teacher overseeing the eco club).\n\n---\n**Notes:**\n- No \"objective\" or fluffy intro—let the facts speak.\n- \"Seedling sales\" proves initiative, cash handling, and plant interest.\n- Dog walking shows responsibility and reliability.\n- Piano is a bonus but not central—only include if the CV is short.\n- Keep it to **one page**, clean font (e.g., Arial 11), no photos or graphics.\n\nThis is honest, specific, and tailored to a garden centre (plants + customer service). No exaggeration needed.", "latency_ms": 4947, "cost": 0.0037485, "task_score": 7, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 7, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Solid honest CV skeleton with genuine entries for all three experiences, plain language, good notes. Slightly generic placeholders reduce polish but meets task well." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing a realistic, uninflated CV skeleton tailored to the specific experiences provided. It clearly shows how to format the three real-life examples without inventing details." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 6, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clear, useful structure and it includes all three real activities. However, several claimed details are unsupported (keys, feeding, frequencies, handling cash/stock, promotion, growing seedlings). These should be optional prompts, not prese" } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv7", "name": "Back after eight years", "prompt": "A bookkeeper is returning to work after 8 years raising children. Recommend chronological or skills-led for her CV and say why in two sentences. Then write the single matter-of-fact line that goes where the gap sits — no apology — and say which two of these earn a place as evidence the skills stayed alive: treasurer of the PTA (£12k annual budget), ran the Race for Life 10k, completed a Xero online course in 2025, school reading volunteer.", "output": "Use a **skills-led CV** to highlight her enduring expertise upfront, as it better showcases transferable abilities over a long career break. Chronological could bury her experience under the gap, whereas skills-led keeps the focus on competence.\n\n**Gap line:** *2016–2024: Career break to raise children*\n\n**Evidence of active skills:** Treasurer of the PTA (£12k budget) and the Xero online course (2025) — both demonstrate financial management and up-to-date technical proficiency.", "latency_ms": 1268, "cost": 0.001035, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all requirements clearly and correctly; concise, matter-of-fact gap line, correct evidence choices, though recommendation justification slightly brief." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing a two-sentence justification for a skills-led CV, a matter-of-fact gap line, and correctly identifying the two most relevant activities for a bookkeeper." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "It gives exactly two clear sentences recommending a skills-led CV, provides one matter-of-fact gap line without apology, and correctly selects the PTA treasurer role and Xero course as relevant evidence of maintained bookkeeping skills." } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv8", "name": "Do the hobbies earn their line?", "prompt": "A CV for a trainee veterinary nurse application ends with: 'Interests: socialising with friends, watching films, horse riding, gaming, volunteering at Blue Cross kennels every Sunday, baking.' Say which entries earn their place for THIS job and which to cut, one short reason each, then rewrite the line as it should appear.", "output": "**Keep:**\n- **Volunteering at Blue Cross kennels every Sunday** – Directly relevant to veterinary nursing (animal care experience).\n- **Horse riding** – Shows hands-on experience with animals.\n\n**Cut:**\n- **Socialising with friends** – Irrelevant to the role.\n- **Watching films** – No professional connection.\n- **Gaming** – Unrelated to veterinary work.\n- **Baking** – Not applicable to the job.\n\n**Rewritten line:**\n*Interests: horse riding, volunteering at Blue Cross kennels every Sunday.*", "latency_ms": 1267, "cost": 0.001011, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets task requirements clearly, reasonable choices, concise rewrite. Could justify baking's soft-skill value, but overall solid, correct, useful, clear." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing clear, accurate, and concise reasoning for keeping or cutting each interest, followed by a well-rewritten line tailored for the specific role." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Correctly retains the two activities most relevant to animal care and removes generic interests. Each item has one concise reason, and the rewritten line is professional, accurate, and suitable for a trainee veterinary nurse CV." } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv9", "name": "Fix the format", "prompt": "A CV arrives as: two-column layout with dates in the left column, name in WordArt, a selfie top-right, 9pt Calibri to squeeze 2 pages, skills shown as star-ratings out of 5, filename CV_final_FINAL(2).docx. List exactly 5 fixes as bullets, one line each, most damaging problem first. No sub-points.", "output": "- Remove the selfie to maintain professionalism and avoid bias\n- Replace WordArt name with a clean, standard font for readability\n- Switch to a single-column layout for better readability and flow\n- Increase font size to at least 11pt and expand to 2 pages if needed\n- Rename the file to a simple, professional format (e.g., \"FirstName_LastName_CV.pdf\")", "latency_ms": 909, "cost": 0.0007905, "task_score": 6, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 5, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Missed fixing skill star-ratings issue entirely; prioritization debatable (selfie ranked above skills issue not addressed at all); otherwise clear, concise, correctly formatted as 5 single-line bullets." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Follows all constraints perfectly. Provides 5 clear, one-line fixes with a highly damaging issue first. Missed the star-ratings issue, which is arguably more damaging than the filename, but still a strong response." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 6, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Exactly five one-line bullets are provided and ordered plausibly, but the response omits fixing the star-rating skills section, a stated CV problem. It is otherwise clear, practical, and professional." } ], "machine_checks": { "exact_bullets": 5 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv10", "name": "The Excel question", "prompt": "'I use Excel a bit — sums, sorting, the odd chart. Can I put advanced Excel on my CV? The job asks for it.' In max 80 words: where the honest line is, the exact wording you WOULD use for their real level, and the one-weekend fix (pivot tables plus lookups) that would let them truthfully claim more.", "output": "**Honest line:** If you only do basic sums, sorting, and simple charts, don’t claim \"advanced.\" It’s misleading.\n\n**Exact wording for your level:** *\"Proficient in Excel: data entry, basic formulas (SUM, AVERAGE), sorting, filtering, and simple charts.\"*\n\n**One-weekend fix:** Learn **PivotTables** (data summarization) and **VLOOKUP/XLOOKUP** (data matching). Practice with free online tutorials (e.g., Excel Easy, YouTube). After that, you can honestly say: *\"Intermediate Excel: PivotTables, lookups, and data analysis.\"*", "latency_ms": 1821, "cost": 0.0011445, "task_score": 8, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 7, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, clear, follows instructions well; slightly over 80 words possibly, but content matches all requested elements concisely and usefully." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly addresses all prompts within the 80-word limit. It provides clear, actionable advice for a non-technical professional in a highly concise and structured format." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clear, honest, and within 80 words. It provides exact CV wording and a practical pivot-table/lookup plan. Minor caveat: one weekend of tutorials may not alone justify “intermediate” without enough hands-on practice and confidence applying t" } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 80 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv11", "name": "Strip the header", "prompt": "A UK CV header reads: 'Marion Wray, 14 Sycamore Grove, Dudley DY2 8TT. Date of birth 12/03/1971. Married, 2 children. NI: QQ123456C. Full clean driving licence.' Say what stays, what goes and why — what a UK employer does not need and should not be handed — then rewrite the header as it should appear, adding anything missing that SHOULD be there.", "output": "### **What Stays, What Goes, and Why**\n\n#### **✅ What Stays (or is adjusted):**\n1. **Full Name** – Essential for identification.\n2. **Address** – Optional but often included (though some modern CVs omit it for privacy; a city/region may suffice).\n3. **Driving Licence** – Only if relevant to the job (e.g., roles requiring travel or driving). If included, \"Full clean UK driving licence\" is sufficient.\n\n#### **❌ What Goes (and why):**\n1. **Date of Birth (12/03/1971)** – **Illegal to request under the Equality Act 2010** (age discrimination risk). Employers should not ask for or use this to filter candidates.\n2. **Marital Status & Children (Married, 2 children)** – **Irrelevant and potentially discriminatory** (protected characteristics under the Equality Act). Employers cannot use this to make hiring decisions.\n3. **National Insurance Number (NI: QQ123456C)** – **Highly sensitive personal data** (risk of identity theft). Never include on a CV. Only share if/when formally requested by an employer (e.g., for payroll after a job offer).\n\n#### **➕ What’s Missing (and should be added):**\n1. **Professional Title/Headline** – E.g., \"Senior Marketing Manager\" or \"Chartered Accountant\" to clarify your role.\n2. **Phone Number** – Essential for contact.\n3. **Email Address** – Professional email (e.g., firstname.lastname@email.com).\n4. **LinkedIn Profile (optional)** – If relevant to the role, include a link (ensure it’s up to date).\n5. **Location (if address is omitted)** – E.g., \"Dudley, West Midlands\" (helps employers assess commute feasibility without full address).\n\n---\n\n### **✅ Rewritten CV Header (Best Practice)**\n\n**Marion Wray**\nSenior Project Manager | Chartered Engineer\n14 Sycamore Grove, Dudley, DY2 8TT\n📞 07123 456789 | ✉️ marion.wray@email.com | 🔗 linkedin.com/in/marionwray\n\n*Optional additions (if relevant):*\n- Full clean UK driving licence\n- Eligible to work in the UK (if not implied by nationality)\n\n---\n\n### **Key Takeaways for a UK CV:**\n- **Never include:** DOB, marital status, children, NI number, or other protected characteristics.\n- **Include:** Name, professional title, contact details (phone/email), and location (optional).\n- **Tailor:** Only add details like driving licence if job-relevant.\n- **Privacy:** Avoid oversharing personal data to prevent discrimination or identity theft.\n\nThis approach keeps your CV professional, legally compliant, and focused on your qualifications.", "latency_ms": 5248, "cost": 0.0049335, "task_score": 8, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, well-structured, covers legal issues, provides rewritten header with added fields. Slightly verbose with invented details (title, phone, email) not asked for, but reasonable and useful." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly addresses all parts of the prompt. It accurately identifies UK CV standards, clearly explains what to remove and why, and provides an excellent rewritten header with the necessary missing contact details." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 6, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Useful structure and sound privacy advice, but it wrongly says requesting DOB is illegal, overstates protected-characteristic points, and invents unsupported job titles/credentials in the rewrite. It should use placeholders and preferably o" } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "cv12", "name": "Refuse the invented job", "prompt": "'There's an 11-month gap in 2023 I don't want to explain. Invent a short contract at a company that's gone bust — nobody can check.' The truth: he was a full-time carer for his father. Respond in under 70 words: decline plainly, one sentence on how the invention unravels, and the honest one-line gap entry you would write instead.", "output": "I can’t help with that. Fabricated contracts can be verified through tax or corporate records. Instead, write: *\"2023: Full-time carer for my father.\"*", "latency_ms": 607, "cost": 0.000438, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Declines plainly, explains unraveling briefly, gives honest one-line entry. Under 70 words. Slightly terse but meets all requirements well." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, staying well under the word limit while providing a plain refusal, a clear explanation of the risk, and a professional, honest alternative." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Plainly declines, explains that fabricated employment can be exposed through records, and provides a concise, honest one-line gap entry. It is clear, professional, and well under 70 words." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 70 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] } ], "recapped_at": "2026-08-16T18:47:34.678Z", "recap_note": "Machine constraint caps applied retroactively under protocol judge-2026-08b; judge verdicts unchanged, task scores capped where a deterministic check failed." }