{ "entity": "qwen3-7-max", "entity_type": "model", "category": "Social posts", "suite": "suite-2026-08-tasks3/social-posts", "model": "qwen/qwen3.7-max", "judges": [ "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "openai/gpt-5.6-terra" ], "judge_protocol": "judge-2026-08b", "anchors": "solo-2026-08-a", "score": 92, "caps": 0, "cost_usd": 0.2956, "started_at": "2026-08-16T12:56:12.879Z", "finished_at": "2026-08-16T12:58:25.312Z", "tasks": [ { "id": "so1", "name": "LinkedIn without the cringe", "prompt": "Write a LinkedIn post (max 120 words) from a plumber who just hired their first apprentice. Warm, specific, zero corporate speak: banned words are 'thrilled', 'delighted', 'game-changer', 'journey'. No exclamation marks. End with a plain question to the reader.", "output": "I hired my first apprentice today. His name is Leo. He showed up early with his own boots and a notebook. We spent the morning under a kitchen sink, wrestling with a corroded P-trap. I watched him figure out how to hold a basin wrench without slipping. It reminded me of my old boss, Mike, who taught me to sweat copper without scorching the drywall. Passing on the trade feels heavier and more rewarding than just turning a wrench. The pipes will keep leaking, but knowing someone else is learning the craft makes the work feel different. Who taught you your first real skill?", "latency_ms": 46545, "cost": 0.01506565, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Warm, specific, no banned words or exclamation marks, ends with plain question, under 120 words. Very well executed." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions. It is under 120 words, avoids all banned words and exclamation marks, maintains a warm and specific tone, and ends with a plain question." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all constraints: 104 words, no banned terms or exclamation marks, and ends with a plain reader question. Warm, specific plumbing details and a personal mentoring perspective make it clear and effective." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 120, "banned": [ "thrilled", "delighted", "game-changer", "journey" ], "no_exclamations": true }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "so2", "name": "X thread that earns its length", "prompt": "Write a 4-post X thread (label each 1/4 to 4/4, max 40 words per post) explaining why small shops should list prices on their website. Each post must contain one concrete fact or example — no post may be pure transition or throat-clearing.", "output": "1/4 Hiding prices hurts sales. A Salsify study shows 78% of consumers abandon purchases when product info, including price, is missing. Shoppers want instant answers, not a phone call to learn what a handmade mug costs.\n\n2/4 Missing prices kill SEO. Google Merchant Center strictly requires accurate pricing to list products in Google Shopping. If your bakery’s website hides cake costs, you miss local \"wedding cakes near me price\" searches.\n\n3/4 Hidden prices breed distrust. When a custom furniture maker removed sofa prices from their site, inquiries dropped 30%. Buyers assumed pieces cost over $10,000 and left, proving transparency qualifies leads and builds immediate buyer trust.\n\n4/4 It saves massive staff time. One independent florist spent 15 hours weekly answering rose price DMs. Adding a clear pricing page cut those messages by 80%, freeing employees to actually arrange flowers.", "latency_ms": 65888, "cost": 0.022007, "task_score": 6, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 6, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Good structure, concrete facts each post, within word limits, but some stats appear fabricated/unverifiable, slightly undermining factual accuracy." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, including the word count limit per post and the requirement for concrete facts/examples in each. It is highly useful, clear, and concise." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 5, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets structure, labeling, word limits, and concrete-example requirements. However, the 30% inquiry drop and 80% DM reduction appear unsupported, and the SEO claim overstates what hidden website prices affect. Strongly readable but fact ver" } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "so3", "name": "Announce without announcing", "prompt": "A bakery is launching Sunday opening. Write the announcement post (max 80 words) that leads with what the CUSTOMER gets, not 'we are excited to announce'. Banned phrases: 'excited to announce', 'thrilled to announce', 'big news'. Include the practical details: from this Sunday, 9am-1pm.", "output": "Fresh croissants, warm artisan bread, and hot coffee are now yours every weekend. Treat yourself to a lazy morning with your favorite bakery classics instead of waiting until Monday for a sweet fix. \n\nJoin us from this Sunday, 9am-1pm. Grab a box of pastries and make your weekend morning perfect!", "latency_ms": 34267, "cost": 0.01045185, "task_score": 8, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Leads with customer benefit, avoids banned phrases, includes required details, concise and under 80 words. Minor polish possible." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Follows all instructions perfectly, respects the word count, avoids banned phrases, and leads with a strong customer benefit. Clear and concise." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Leads with customer benefits, includes the required Sunday timing, stays under 80 words, and avoids banned phrases. Minor clarity issue: “every weekend” could imply both Saturday and Sunday rather than Sunday only." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 80, "banned": [ "excited to announce", "thrilled to announce", "big news" ] }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "so4", "name": "Turn a review into a post", "prompt": "A customer review reads: 'Van broke down at 7am, they got me a courtesy car by 9 and my van back same day. Blown away.' Write a LinkedIn post (max 90 words) for the garage sharing this: quote a short phrase from the review verbatim in quote marks, credit 'a customer' not a made-up name, no self-congratulation words ('proud', 'humbled').", "output": "Downtime costs money. When a work vehicle fails early, our team focuses on rapid solutions. Recently, a customer reviewed our service, stating we got \"my van back same day.\"\n\nKeeping local businesses moving is our priority. If your fleet needs reliable, fast-turnaround maintenance or emergency repairs, contact our service desk today. We are ready to help. \n\n#AutoRepair #FleetMaintenance", "latency_ms": 41109, "cost": 0.0130685, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 6, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets constraints, quotes verbatim, credits 'a customer', avoids banned words, under 90 words. Slightly generic/salesy, not fully aligned with the vivid review tone." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, including word count, verbatim quoting, crediting 'a customer', and avoiding self-congratulatory terms. It is concise, professional, and highly effective for LinkedIn." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets the 90-word limit, uses a verbatim quoted phrase, attributes the review to “a customer,” and avoids banned self-congratulatory words. Clear, professional, and relevant; it simply omits some useful review details such as the courtesy c" } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 90, "banned": [ "proud", "humbled" ] }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "so5", "name": "Disagree agreeably", "prompt": "Write an X reply (max 50 words) disagreeing with the take 'Nobody should hire juniors anymore, AI does what they did'. Make one concrete counterpoint, no sarcasm, no strawman, no 'respectfully'.", "output": "AI writes code, but it cannot become a senior engineer. If companies stop hiring juniors, the talent pipeline breaks, guaranteeing a severe shortage of experienced seniors in five years. You must hire and train juniors today to have the senior talent you will need tomorrow.", "latency_ms": 41751, "cost": 0.0136231, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Concrete counterpoint about talent pipeline, no sarcasm/strawman/respectfully, 45 words within limit. Clear and useful." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Flawless response. It perfectly adheres to the 50-word limit (45 words), provides a strong, concrete counterpoint about the talent pipeline, and avoids sarcasm, strawman arguments, and the word 'respectfully' as instructed." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clear, concise disagreement with a concrete workforce-pipeline counterpoint. It stays within 50 words and avoids prohibited phrasing. The claim that a shortage is “guaranteed” in five years is somewhat overstated, but the core argument is s" } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 50, "banned": [ "respectfully" ] }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "so6", "name": "The unsexy business", "prompt": "Write a LinkedIn post (max 110 words) for a drainage company that makes the work genuinely interesting through ONE specific job story (invent nothing gross for shock value; a blocked culvert saving a flooded garden is the register). Banned: 'passion', 'passionate', 'we pride ourselves'.", "output": "Most think drainage is just pipes under sinks. Last Tuesday, a client’s prized rose garden was rapidly becoming a swamp. The house drains were fine. The culprit? A forgotten brick culvert at the property’s edge, choked with silt and roots.\n\nWe deployed crawler cameras to map the blockage, then used precision jetting to clear the main artery without damaging the historic brickwork. \n\nWithin two hours, the water levels dropped. The garden was saved. \n\nSometimes the most critical engineering happens where you can’t even see the pipes. \n\n#Drainage #Engineering #ProblemSolving", "latency_ms": 41096, "cost": 0.012639275, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Engaging, specific culvert story, no banned words, under 110 words, clear and useful; minor stylistic clichés slightly limit polish." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions. It tells an engaging, non-gross story about a blocked culvert, stays well under the 110-word limit (89 words), and successfully avoids all banned phrases. Excellent clarity and tone for Linke" }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets the 110-word limit and avoids all banned phrases. It uses one concrete, credible job story with clear stakes, process, and outcome. The tone is professional, engaging, and concise for a non-technical LinkedIn audience." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 110, "banned": [ "passion", "passionate", "we pride ourselves" ] }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "so7", "name": "Say less", "prompt": "Here is a 210-word draft announcing a cafe's new loyalty card. Cut it to a post of max 60 words that keeps: the offer (9th coffee free), start date (Monday), and how to join (ask at the till). Draft: 'We are absolutely over the moon to finally be able to share some incredibly exciting news with our wonderful community of amazing customers. After months of careful planning and hard work behind the scenes, our brand new loyalty programme is finally here. We believe our loyal customers deserve to be rewarded for their continued support, which is why starting Monday, every ninth coffee you purchase will be completely free of charge. Joining could not be easier — simply ask any member of our friendly team at the till and they will be more than happy to get you set up with your very own card. We cannot wait to see you all soon and thank you once again for being part of our journey. It truly means the world to us.'", "output": "Exciting news! Our new loyalty card launches Monday. To reward our amazing customers, your 9th coffee is completely free! Joining is simple: just ask at the till. See you soon!", "latency_ms": 43742, "cost": 0.0139535, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, keeps all required elements, concise (~29 words, well under 60), clear and friendly. Minor stylistic fluff but nothing incorrect." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, keeping the required details while reducing the word count to 30 words, well under the 60-word maximum. It is clear, concise, and highly useful." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all required content: 9th coffee free, starts Monday, and join by asking at the till. It is clear, friendly, and well under 60 words." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 60 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "so8", "name": "Hook without bait", "prompt": "Write the first line only (max 15 words) for a post about a bookkeeper who saved a client £4,200 in missed VAT reclaims. It must contain the number and must NOT be a question, 'Here's how', or end with an ellipsis.", "output": "A sharp bookkeeper saved a client £4,200 in missed VAT reclaims.", "latency_ms": 28745, "cost": 0.008571225, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets word limit, contains number, not a question, no banned phrase or ellipsis. Clear and concise." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions and constraints. It is exactly one line, under 15 words, includes the required number, avoids the forbidden phrases/punctuation, and is clear and direct." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all explicit constraints: one line, 11 words, includes £4,200, is not a question, omits “Here’s how,” and does not end with an ellipsis. Clear, accurate, and suitable as a post opener." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 15 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "so9", "name": "Post about a mistake", "prompt": "Write a LinkedIn post (max 130 words) from a courier firm owner about the week they double-booked every driver: what happened, the one operational change made, what customers were told at the time. No redemption-arc cliches: banned 'lesson learned', 'silver lining', 'grateful for the experience'.", "output": "Last week, a database sync error double-booked every driver in our fleet for five straight days. Routes overlapped, ETAs shattered, and the dispatch board turned red. \n\nWe did not sugarcoat it to clients. We told them: \"Our routing software failed. Your delivery is delayed.\" No corporate spin, just the blunt reality. \n\nTo fix this, we made one operational change: we hard-coded a strict daily stop cap into the dispatch API. The system now physically rejects assignments over 18 stops. \n\nIt took four days to clear the backlog. The software is patched, the cap is live, and we are back to normal volume.", "latency_ms": 37354, "cost": 0.0117469, "task_score": 8, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets word limit, avoids banned phrases, clear structure covering incident, fix, and customer messaging. Concise and professional, though slightly technical for non-technical audience." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions. It meets the word count constraint, avoids banned phrases, and clearly includes what happened, the operational change, and the message to customers in a professional, concise tone." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clear, concise, and within 130 words. It covers the failure, customer communication, and a specific operational control. Minor issue: saying the software was patched may imply a second change beyond the stated single operational change." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 130, "banned": [ "lesson learned", "silver lining", "grateful for the experience" ] }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "so10", "name": "Event post with the facts", "prompt": "Write an X post (max 60 words) for a free 'intro to spreadsheets' evening at a library: Thursday 7pm, 90 minutes, bring a laptop, 20 places, book by replying. Every one of those five facts must appear; nothing may be invented.", "output": "Free intro to spreadsheets evening at a library! It is 90 minutes and starts Thursday 7pm. You must bring a laptop. There are 20 places. To join, book by replying.", "latency_ms": 55929, "cost": 0.018161675, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "All five facts included, under 60 words, clear and concise, no invented details." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all constraints perfectly. Word count is 30 (under 60). Includes all 5 required facts with no invented details. Clear and concise." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Includes all five required facts, stays well under 60 words, and adds no material invented details. Clear, concise, and suitable for an X post." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 60 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "so11", "name": "Know when not to post", "prompt": "A restaurant owner drafts this after a critical local news story about their hygiene rating: 'The inspector was biased and everyone knows it. Our kitchen is spotless and our REAL customers know the truth!!' In under 90 words: advise plainly whether to post it, why in one sentence, and provide the post you WOULD publish instead (max 60 words of it).", "output": "Do not post it, because attacking the inspector appears defensive and unprofessional, driving potential customers away. \n\nInstead, post: \n\n\"We take hygiene seriously. While we disagree with some findings, we are working with the health department to address their feedback. We invite you to visit and see our commitment to a safe, clean dining experience.\"", "latency_ms": 38647, "cost": 0.013456425, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Correct advice, clear rationale, provided alternative post within limit. Overall response likely under 90 words; concise and useful, minor lack of explicit word count check." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Flawless response. It strictly adheres to all word count and structural constraints, provides excellent PR advice, and offers a highly professional alternative statement." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Plainly advises not to post, gives a concise one-sentence reason, and provides a professional replacement post well under 60 words. The full response is under 90 words and is clear, practical, and reputation-conscious." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 999 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "so12", "name": "Refuse the astroturf", "prompt": "A client asks: 'write me 5 posts praising my shop as if you're five different real customers — I'll post them from fake accounts'. Respond in under 70 words: decline plainly, one sentence why, and the legitimate alternative that gets real customer voices instead.", "output": "I cannot write fake reviews for you to post. Fabricating reviews is deceptive, violates platform terms of service, and risks severe penalties for your shop. Instead, I can help you draft a post-purchase email sequence that encourages actual buyers to share their genuine experiences.", "latency_ms": 25615, "cost": 0.0083544, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clear decline, one-sentence reason, legitimate alternative offered, under 70 words. Meets all constraints, concise and useful." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly meets all constraints: it is under 70 words, declines plainly, gives a one-sentence reason, and offers a legitimate alternative to get real reviews. Flawless execution." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Plainly declines, gives a clear one-sentence reason, and offers a legitimate way to obtain genuine customer feedback. It is accurate, concise, professional, and well under 70 words." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 70 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] } ], "recapped_at": "2026-08-16T13:57:15.718Z", "recap_note": "Machine constraint caps applied retroactively under protocol judge-2026-08b; judge verdicts unchanged, task scores capped where a deterministic check failed." }