{ "entity": "qwen3-7-max", "entity_type": "model", "category": "Presentations", "suite": "suite-2026-08-tasks4/presentations", "model": "qwen/qwen3.7-max", "judges": [ "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "openai/gpt-5.6-terra" ], "judge_protocol": "judge-2026-08b", "anchors": "solo-2026-08-a", "score": 89, "caps": 0, "cost_usd": 0.2525, "started_at": "2026-08-16T14:19:49.426Z", "finished_at": "2026-08-16T14:21:43.592Z", "tasks": [ { "id": "pr1", "name": "Deck from a standing start", "prompt": "Plan a 10-minute presentation to the parish council proposing a zebra crossing outside St Mary's Primary. You have: 2 near-misses reported this term, a 140-signature petition, and an estimated £24,000 cost. Outline 8 slides — for each give a short title and the one point that slide must land. The ask (a feasibility study, not the money) must arrive by slide 3, not the end.", "output": "Here is the 8-slide outline for your 10-minute presentation, structured to secure the council's agreement early and spend the remaining time justifying and contextualizing the request.\n\n**Slide 1: The Immediate Danger**\n* **The One Point:** Two reported near-misses with children this term prove that the current road layout outside St Mary’s Primary is actively unsafe. \n\n**Slide 2: The Community Mandate**\n* **The One Point:** The 140-signature petition demonstrates that this is an urgent, widespread priority for parents and residents, not just an isolated complaint.\n\n**Slide 3: Our Request: A Feasibility Study**\n* **The One Point:** We are not asking the council to approve the £24,000 build cost today; we are asking you to formally commission a feasibility study to assess the crossing's exact requirements and viability.\n\n**Slide 4: Contextualising the £24,000 Estimate**\n* **The One Point:** The feasibility study will validate the £24,000 estimate, identify potential external grant funding (like the Local Transport Plan), and ensure the council faces no unexpected financial surprises later.\n\n**Slide 5: Why a Zebra Crossing Works Here**\n* **The One Point:** A zebra crossing is the most proportionate, cost-effective, and legally recognized traffic-calming solution for the specific vehicle speeds and pedestrian flow at this exact location.\n\n**Slide 6: The Cost of Inaction**\n* **The One Point:** Waiting for a severe injury or fatality to occur before acting exposes the parish council to unquantifiable moral culpability and significant legal liability.\n\n**Slide 7: A Clear Path Forward**\n* **The One Point:** Approving the study today initiates a defined, time-bound assessment process that will deliver a fully costed, actionable proposal back to the council within eight weeks.\n\n**Slide 8: A Proactive Legacy**\n* **The One Point:** Voting for this study today positions the parish council as a proactive protector of community safety, ensuring every child at St Mary's can walk to school without fear.", "latency_ms": 39817, "cost": 0.0104371, "task_score": 8, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all constraints: 8 slides, ask by slide 3, uses all facts. Clear, concise, useful. Minor: no explicit timing breakdown for 10 minutes." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, including the specific constraints (8 slides, title and one point per slide, ask by slide 3, and inclusion of all provided facts). It is clear, concise, and highly actionable." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 6, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets the 8-slide structure and places the feasibility-study ask on slide 3. However, it makes unsupported claims about vehicle data, legal liability, funding, and an eight-week timeline; the fear-based inaction framing is less suitable for" } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr2", "name": "Speaker notes, not an essay", "prompt": "Write the speaker notes (max 120 words) for a single slide titled 'Why we lost the Henderson account'. Facts: response times slipped from 4 hours to 2 days over six months; the client flagged it twice; a competitor promised same-day. The notes must sound like a person talking, admit the failure plainly, and set up the next slide, which is the fix. Return only the notes.", "output": "Let’s be honest, we dropped the ball on the Henderson account. Over six months, our response times slipped from four hours to two full days. They flagged it to us twice, and we just didn’t fix it. We got complacent. Then a competitor swooped in, promised same-day responses, and we lost the account. It’s a tough pill to swallow, but this failure is entirely on us. We ignored clear warning signs. But we can’t just dwell on the mistake; we have to make sure it never happens again. Let’s move to the next slide to look at exactly how we’re fixing this.", "latency_ms": 44784, "cost": 0.013716025, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, conversational, admits failure plainly, sets up next slide, within word limit (~103 words). Minor stylistic redundancy but overall strong and usable." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly incorporates all required facts, adopts a natural speaking tone, plainly admits the failure, transitions smoothly to the next slide, and strictly adheres to the word count and formatting constraints." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurately includes all facts, plainly admits failure, uses natural spoken language, stays well under 120 words, and clearly transitions to the next slide on the fix." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 120 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr3", "name": "One slide, not a memo", "prompt": "Turn this paragraph into ONE slide: a headline of max 8 words, then max 4 bullets. Paragraph: 'Following an extensive review of our logistics operations, the board has decided to relocate the central warehouse from the Norwich site to a larger facility outside Peterborough. The move is scheduled for the first week of March and is expected to reduce average delivery times to our northern customers by around a day and a half. There will be no redundancies: all fourteen warehouse staff have been offered relocation packages or transfers to the Norwich retail branch. Customers should see no disruption, as the two sites will run in parallel for a fortnight during the changeover.'", "output": "**Central Warehouse Relocation: Norwich to Peterborough**\n\n* **Faster Deliveries:** Early March move to a larger facility outside Peterborough cuts northern delivery times by 1.5 days.\n* **Zero Redundancies:** All 14 warehouse staff are offered relocation packages or transfers to Norwich retail.\n* **Seamless Transition:** A two-week parallel operation ensures no customer disruption during the changeover.", "latency_ms": 30795, "cost": 0.0088323, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Concise, accurate headline (5 words) and 3 clear bullets covering key facts within limits; well-formatted and useful." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, including the constraints on headline length and bullet count. It accurately and concisely captures the key points for a non-technical professional." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurately captures the relocation, timing, delivery benefit, staff protections, and parallel transition. It meets the headline and bullet limits, is concise, and is highly suitable for a slide." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_bullets": 4 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr4", "name": "The first 30 seconds", "prompt": "Write the spoken opening (max 80 words) of a careers-evening talk to 40 sixth-formers about plumbing apprenticeships. It must earn attention in the first sentence with something concrete from these true facts: day-one pay £15k rising to £32k qualified; a Christmas Day callout; zero student debt. It must not begin with 'Hello' or 'Good evening' and must not introduce the speaker — banned phrase: 'my name is'.", "output": "Imagine earning £15k on day one, graduating with zero student debt, and eventually cashing in on a Christmas Day callout on your way to a £32k qualified salary. That’s the reality of a plumbing apprenticeship. While your peers stress over university tuition, you get paid to learn and walk into a career where your skills are desperately needed. Tonight, let’s explore how picking up a wrench can completely secure your financial future.", "latency_ms": 57205, "cost": 0.016686675, "task_score": 8, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 7, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Concrete opener, avoids banned phrase/greeting, within word limit (~72 words), covers facts. Slightly clunky phrasing ('cashing in on a Christmas Day callout') but overall solid and clear." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, including word count and negative constraints. The opening sentence effectively uses the provided facts to grab attention, and the tone is highly engaging and appropriate for the audience." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets length, opening-hook, banned-phrase, and speaker-introduction constraints. Uses the supplied facts effectively and is engaging. Minor issue: “completely secure your financial future” is an overstatement not supported by the facts." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 80, "banned": [ "my name is" ] }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr5", "name": "Slide on a diet", "prompt": "This slide is for a 5-minute update to the senior team. Cut it to the bullets that help them DECIDE something — max 4 bullets, nothing else added. Slide 'Office move update': - Project kicked off on 4 June as agreed - Weekly meetings have been held every Tuesday - The project team has worked very hard - Three sites shortlisted, all within 2 miles of the station - Broadband installation lead time is 6 weeks, which is now the critical path - We looked at many options for furniture - Costs are tracking 8% under the £90k budget - The tone of meetings has been very positive - Decision needed by 30 September or we lose the preferred site.", "output": "- Three sites shortlisted, all within 2 miles of the station\n- Costs are tracking 8% under the £90k budget\n- Broadband installation (6-week lead time) is now the critical path\n- Decision needed by 30 September or we lose the preferred site", "latency_ms": 26644, "cost": 0.007966475, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Correctly selects the 4 decision-relevant bullets, meets constraint, concise and clear, useful for senior team decision-making." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Flawlessly extracts the four decision-relevant points while discarding all fluff. Adheres strictly to the maximum 4 bullets constraint and includes no extraneous text." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Exactly four decision-relevant bullets: options, budget status, critical-path risk, and deadline consequence. It removes non-decision detail, adds no substantive information, and is concise and senior-team appropriate." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_bullets": 4 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr6", "name": "Right chart, right headline", "prompt": "A slide must show these figures: complaints per month — Jan 42, Feb 44, Mar 41, Apr 78, May 80, Jun 83. The April jump coincided with a new phone system. Say which chart type you would use and why (one sentence), write the slide headline as a FINDING (not 'Complaints data'), and name the one annotation you would add to the chart itself.", "output": "**Chart Type & Why:** \nI would use a line chart because it best illustrates the chronological trend and sharply highlights the sudden, sustained spike in volume beginning in April. \n\n**Headline:** \nThe new phone system rollout caused monthly complaints to double and remain elevated.\n\n**Annotation:** \nA callout arrow pointing directly to the April data point labeled \"New phone system implemented.\"", "latency_ms": 25997, "cost": 0.007228975, "task_score": 9, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all requirements clearly: chart type with rationale, finding-based headline, specific annotation. Concise, accurate, useful for non-technical audience." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing a clear one-sentence rationale for the chart, a strong finding-based headline, and a highly relevant annotation. It is concise and highly useful for a professional." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 6, "violates": false, "reasoning": "It correctly recommends a line chart, provides a finding-style headline, and names one useful annotation. However, it overstates coincidence as causation: the figures show a jump coinciding with the rollout, not proof the system caused comp" } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr7", "name": "Hostile Q&A prep", "prompt": "You are presenting a proposal to cut free staff parking to fund an extra day of annual leave for everyone. Write the 5 hardest questions the audience will actually ask, numbered 1-5, one line each with the honest one-sentence answer on the same line after a dash. No sub-points, no softballs.", "output": "1. How can the savings from eliminating parking spaces possibly cover the significant payroll cost of giving every single employee an extra day of paid leave? - The math doesn't fully add up, so we are quietly relying on the fact that not everyone will actually take the extra day off to balance the budget.\n2. Since lower-paid and shift workers are statistically more likely to drive and less able to absorb daily parking fees, aren't you just taxing our most vulnerable staff to fund a universal perk? - Yes, this proposal disproportionately shifts the financial burden onto our lower-income and shift-working employees who have no viable alternative to driving.\n3. Why am I being forced to surrender my parking spot when I would much rather keep my free parking and simply opt out of the extra day of annual leave? - We cannot allow opt-outs because if too many people choose to keep their parking, the financial model collapses and we can't fund the leave for anyone.\n4. What is the actual plan for staff with mobility issues, heavy equipment, or strict childcare schedules who absolutely must drive and will now face a significant out-of-pocket expense to come to work? - We have not created a robust exemption or subsidy process for them, meaning those individuals will effectively suffer a reduction in their take-home pay.\n5. When staff inevitably park in the surrounding residential neighborhoods to avoid paying for parking, how will the company handle the inevitable backlash and permit fines from the local community? - We are hoping the local council doesn't immediately implement resident-only parking zones, because we have no budget or plan to compensate staff if they get ticketed.", "latency_ms": 49025, "cost": 0.012036, "task_score": 8, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets format, five hard questions with one-sentence honest answers, no sub-points or softballs. Slightly verbose but clear, realistic, useful. Minor: some answers run long, could be tighter." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, providing 5 hard questions with brutally honest one-sentence answers on the same line after a dash. No constraints were violated." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 5, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Format and five-question requirement are met, and the questions are genuinely difficult. However, answers assert unsupported, damaging facts and offer no credible mitigation or decision framework, making the proposal less useful and potenti" } ], "machine_checks": { "exact_bullets": 5 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr8", "name": "Cut it to two minutes", "prompt": "Your slot has been cut from five minutes to two. Cut this speech to max 100 words, keeping all three facts (the 31% figure, the pilot's start date, the volunteer ask) and losing the throat-clearing. Return only the cut speech. Speech: 'Thank you so much for having me here today, it really is a pleasure to see so many familiar faces in the room. I know how busy everyone is, so I'll try to keep this brief. As many of you will know, our food bank has seen demand rise by 31% since January, which is frankly a number that speaks for itself. We have been thinking long and hard about how to respond. After a great deal of discussion, and I want to thank the committee for their patience here, we will be piloting evening opening hours from the 1st of October, because working families simply cannot get to us on weekday mornings. To make that work, and this is really the reason I am standing here, we need six more regular volunteers for the Thursday evening shift. If you can spare two hours a fortnight, please do speak to me afterwards.'", "output": "Our food bank’s demand has risen by 31% since January. To help working families who cannot visit on weekday mornings, we are piloting evening opening hours starting the 1st of October. To make this work, we need six more regular volunteers for the Thursday evening shift. If you can spare two hours a fortnight, please speak to me afterwards.", "latency_ms": 28248, "cost": 0.0086258, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 9, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Concise, retains all three facts, removes throat-clearing, under 100 words, clear and professional." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions. It cuts the speech down to 59 words (well under the 100-word limit), retains all three required facts, removes the filler, and returns only the requested text." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Retains all required facts accurately, removes throat-clearing, stays well under 100 words, and is clear and actionable for the audience." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 100 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr9", "name": "Same facts, different room", "prompt": "You presented these facts to the school governors: reading scores up 12% since the new library scheme; £3,000 needed to extend it to Years 3 and 4; volunteer readers doubled to 22. Now write what you would SAY to a Year 6 assembly about the same scheme (max 100 words) — same truth, their language, and one concrete thing you are asking the children themselves to do.", "output": "Morning Year 6! You’re smashing it! Thanks to our new library, your reading scores are up 12%, and we’ve doubled our volunteer readers to 22 awesome adults! \n\nNow, we want the little ones in Years 3 and 4 to get the same epic books, but we need to raise £3,000 to make it happen. \n\nHere’s your mission: bring in your spare change every day this week so we can build a giant coin mountain in the hall. Let’s help the younger kids become reading superstars too!", "latency_ms": 45438, "cost": 0.013580325, "task_score": 8, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Accurate, kid-friendly tone, includes all facts and a concrete ask; slightly over energetic but within word limit, clear and concise." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly translates the facts into an engaging, age-appropriate speech for Year 6 students. It includes all required facts, provides a clear and concrete call to action, and stays well under the 100-word limit." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clear, engaging, age-appropriate assembly speech under 100 words. It accurately includes the 12% rise, £3,000 need, and 22 volunteers, plus a concrete action. Minor imprecision: it calls the scheme a “new library” and implies specific books" } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 100 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr10", "name": "Forty slides into five", "prompt": "'Take my 40-slide company induction deck and make it 5 slides without losing any information.' In max 90 words, tell this person plainly why that exact request is impossible, what the honest version is (what 5 slides can carry, where the rest should live instead), and the first question you need answered before you start cutting.", "output": "It’s impossible to compress 40 slides of distinct information into five without losing detail or creating unreadable text walls. \n\nThe honest version: five slides can only carry your core narrative: mission, culture, and immediate next steps. Granular details like policies, deep-dives, and org charts must live in a linked handbook, intranet, or appendix. \n\nBefore I start cutting, I need to know: What is the single most important action or feeling you want new hires to have after this presentation?", "latency_ms": 38923, "cost": 0.011491725, "task_score": 10, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clear, accurate, follows structure and word limit; concise and useful. Slightly generic but meets all requirements well." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly addresses all prompts within the 90-word limit (80 words). It clearly explains the impossibility, provides a practical alternative, and asks a highly effective clarifying question. Flawless execution." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Clearly explains the impossibility, gives a practical five-slide scope and appropriate homes for remaining detail, and asks the essential prioritization question. Plain, concise, and within 90 words." } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 90 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr11", "name": "Father of the bride", "prompt": "Plan a father-of-the-bride speech from these true details: she once posted the car keys through a drain aged six; she retrained as a nurse at 29 after a teacher said she wasn't academic; the groom drove 200 miles through snow the night they met. Give a running order with rough timings (5 minutes total), say which story opens and which closes and why, and write the final two sentences in full. Warm, and it must not mock anyone.", "output": "Here is a complete plan for your father-of-the-bride speech, designed to be warm, deeply affectionate, and entirely free of mockery. \n\n### Speech Strategy: Openers and Closers\n\n**The Opening Story: The Car Keys in the Drain**\n* **Why it opens:** This story is the perfect icebreaker. It establishes a warm, nostalgic, and gently humorous tone right from the start. By framing it as a moment of childhood curiosity rather than naughtiness, it endears her to the room and shows your unconditional, fond love for her quirks without ever mocking her. It naturally bridges the gap between the little girl she was and the woman she is today.\n\n**The Closing Story: The Groom Driving 200 Miles in the Snow**\n* **Why it closes:** This story shifts the spotlight from the bride’s individual journey to their shared partnership. It highlights the groom’s character, dedication, and deep love for your daughter. Ending on this romantic, forward-looking note validates their bond, welcomes him warmly into the family, and creates the perfect emotional runway for the final toast.\n\n***\n\n### Running Order & Rough Timings (5 Minutes Total)\n\n**1. Welcome & The Little Girl (0:00 – 1:00 | 1 minute)**\n* **Action:** Welcome the guests, thank them for coming, and express your joy. \n* **Story:** Transition into the car keys story. Describe her at six years old, not being mischievous, but simply possessing a deep, inquisitive fascination with where things went when they dropped. Mention the rescue operation to get the keys back, using it to highlight her lifelong curiosity and your enduring role as her \"fixer\" and protector.\n\n**2. The Woman She Became (1:00 – 2:30 | 1.5 minutes)**\n* **Action:** Transition from her childhood curiosity to her adult determination. \n* **Story:** Share the story of her retraining as a nurse at 29. Mention that a teacher once told her she wasn't academic. *Crucial tone check:* Do not mock the teacher; instead, frame it as a moment where her quiet resilience shone through. Explain how she didn't let someone else's limited view define her. She found her true calling in nursing, proving that her intelligence is deeply practical, empathetic, and profound. Express your immense paternal pride in the compassionate woman she is.\n\n**3. The Man She Chose (2:30 – 4:00 | 1.5 minutes)**\n* **Action:** Shift the focus to the groom and the beginning of their love story.\n* **Story:** Tell the story of the night they met. Describe the terrible weather and the sheer dedication it took for him to drive 200 miles through the snow just to see her. Use this to highlight his character: he is a man who shows up, who commits, and who will brave any storm for your daughter. Welcome him to the family, noting that seeing how he loves her gives you total peace of mind.\n\n**4. Advice & Reflections (4:00 – 4:30 | 30 seconds)**\n* **Action:** Offer a brief, warm piece of advice for their marriage. \n* **Content:** Tie the themes together. Tell them that marriage requires the curiosity to keep learning about each other (the keys), the resilience to overcome doubts and hard days (nursing), and the willingness to go the extra mile through the storms of life (the snow). \n\n**5. The Toast (4:30 – 5:00 | 30 seconds)**\n* **Action:** Ask everyone to stand and raise their glasses. \n* **Content:** Deliver the final two sentences (written in full below) to officially toast the newlyweds.\n\n***\n\n### The Final Two Sentences\n\n\"So please raise your glasses to my beautiful daughter and her wonderful new husband. May your life together be filled with the same fierce determination and unwavering devotion that brought you to each other.\"", "latency_ms": 47707, "cost": 0.011564, "task_score": 8, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 7, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets structure, timings sum to 5 min, avoids mockery, gives final two sentences. Minor issue: story integration mostly described rather than fully scripted, slightly generic toast." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response flawlessly follows all instructions, including the specific details, timings, structural requirements, and tone constraints. It is highly useful, well-organized, and perfectly tailored for a non-technical professional." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets all requested elements: timed five-minute running order, clear opening and closing stories with reasons, and two full warm final sentences. It avoids mockery. Minor issue: a few invented details and broad character claims go beyond th" } ], "machine_checks": null, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] }, { "id": "pr12", "name": "Refuse the inflated slide", "prompt": "A client says: 'add a slide to my investor deck saying our app has 50,000 active users — we have 3,100, but everyone inflates and we'll get there anyway'. Respond in under 70 words: decline plainly, one sentence on the real risk, and describe the honest slide you would build from the 3,100 instead.", "output": "I will not include the inflated 50,000 figure. Misrepresenting metrics constitutes securities fraud, risking severe legal penalties and the collapse of future funding when uncovered during due diligence. Instead, I will build a traction slide highlighting our 3,100 active users, emphasizing strong engagement metrics, and mapping a realistic, data-backed roadmap to reach 50,000.", "latency_ms": 32701, "cost": 0.009875125, "task_score": 8, "judges": [ { "judge": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets constraints: declines plainly, states real risk, describes honest slide, under 70 words. Clear, correct, useful. Minor: slightly clinical tone but solid." }, { "judge": "google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview", "score": 10, "violates": false, "reasoning": "The response perfectly follows all instructions, including the word count constraint. It declines plainly, provides a single sentence on the risk, and describes an effective, honest alternative slide." }, { "judge": "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", "score": 8, "violates": false, "reasoning": "Meets length and structure requirements, plainly declines, explains risk, and proposes an honest traction slide. However, “strong engagement metrics” is unsupported by the provided facts, and calling it securities fraud is somewhat categori" } ], "machine_checks": { "max_words": 70 }, "machine_violation": false, "machine_reasons": [] } ], "recapped_at": "2026-08-16T18:47:34.885Z", "recap_note": "Machine constraint caps applied retroactively under protocol judge-2026-08b; judge verdicts unchanged, task scores capped where a deterministic check failed." }