Best AI for summarising documents / head-to-head
Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Profor summarising documents
DeepSeek V4 Pro wins, 95–93
Same 12 summarising documents tasks, marked blind by three rival labs. DeepSeek V4 Pro took 2 tasks, Claude Opus 4.6 took 4, 6 tied. Tested 13 Aug 2026.
Where they differed most
In under 80 words, summarise the disagreement fairly, giving each side equal weight: 'Marketing wants to cut the price to win share, arguing volume will more than compensate. Finance says the last price cut in 2024 produced a 4% volume lift against an 11% margin loss, and would rather spend the same money on retention.'
**Marketing** argues a price cut will drive enough volume growth to offset lower margins, accelerating market-share gains that strengthen the brand's long-term competitive position. **Finance** counters with evidence: the 2024 price cut delivered only a 4% volume increase while eroding margins by 11%, making it a net negative. They propose redirecting equivalent spend toward retention, which preserves margins while protecting existing revenue—a more capital-efficient path to growth. Both sides prioritise growth but disagree on the most effici…
Marketing argues a price cut will win market share, with higher volume offsetting the lower margin. Finance disagrees, citing the 2024 cut that raised volume only 4% while margin fell 11%, and prefers spending the same money on customer retention instead.
Task by task
| Task | Claude Opus 4.6 | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Meeting notes to actions | 10 | 10 |
| Five-bullet summary | 10 | 10 |
| Do not invent | 10 | 10 |
| One-sentence gist | 9 | 8 |
| Preserve the caveat | 10 | 10 |
| Summarise a disagreement | 6 | 10 |
| Extract the decision | 8 | 10 |
| Long to short, no loss | 10 | 10 |
| Summary for a specific reader | 10 | 9 |
| Bullet the risks only | 10 | 10 |
| Headline and standfirst | 9 | 8 |
| Say when there is nothing to summarise | 10 | 9 |
Full receipts: Claude Opus 4.6, DeepSeek V4 Pro · judges gemini-3.1-pro-preview, gpt-5.6-terra, grok-4.5
Questions people ask
Which is better for summarising documents: Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
DeepSeek V4 Pro — it scored 95/100 against 93/100 on our 12-task summarising documents suite, winning 2 tasks to 4 with 6 tied. Every answer was marked blind by three judges from three rival AI labs.
How was this tested?
Both models answered the identical published summarising documents tasks. Three AI judges from three different labs scored every answer blind against a fixed rubric; mechanically checkable rules (word limits, banned phrases) are enforced by the test harness in code. The raw outputs and judge verdicts are downloadable.
More summarising documents head-to-heads: Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro · Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8 · DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.5 · Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.5 · DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Luna · Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Full ranking: Best AI for summarising documents · model pages: Claude Opus 4.6, DeepSeek V4 Pro