Best AI for coding / head-to-head

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.3-Codexfor coding

The verdict

GPT-5.3-Codex wins, 9288

Same 18 coding tasks, marked blind by three rival labs. GPT-5.3-Codex took 9 tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview took 2, 7 tied. Tested 16 Aug 2026.

Where they differed most

The task — Idempotency

Design an idempotent POST /payments endpoint so a client retry cannot charge twice. Describe the key, where it is stored, what happens on a concurrent duplicate, and what you return the second time. Maximum 200 words. Name the failure mode your design still has.

**Key:** A client-generated UUID passed in the `Idempotency-Key` HTTP header. 

**Storage:** A transactional database (e.g., PostgreSQL) or distributed cache (e.g., Redis) storing the key, request payload hash, execution status (pending/completed), and the final HTTP response.

**Concurrent Duplicate:** Handled via atomic operations (e.g., Redis `SETNX` or a SQL `UNIQUE` constraint). The first request atomically inserts the key and marks it "pending". If a concurrent duplicate arrives, the atomic insert fails. The server detects the "pending" s…
Use a client-supplied **Idempotency-Key** (UUID) on `POST /payments`, scoped by `merchant_id` (or customer+endpoint).

Store it in a durable `payment_idempotency` table:

- `(merchant_id, idempotency_key)` **UNIQUE**
- `request_hash` (amount/currency/source fingerprint)
- `status` (`processing|succeeded|failed`)
- `payment_id`
- full `http_status` + `response_body`
- timestamps/TTL

Flow:

1. Start DB transaction.
2. `INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING` a row with `processing`.
3. If insert succeeds, this request “owns” execution; call processor…

Task by task

TaskGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.3-Codex
Duration parser89
Find the bug910
SQL without window functions1010
Infinite useEffect89
Typed debounce910
Leftmost binary search910
Security review99
Safe migration88
Fix the code not the test1010
Race condition99
Retry with backoff98
Recursive type109
Bash one-liner89
Explain and cost1010
Regex with limits89
Callback to async89
Diagnose from a trace88
Idempotency810

Full receipts: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, GPT-5.3-Codex · judges claude-sonnet-5, gpt-5.6-terra, grok-4.5

Questions people ask

Which is better for coding: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.3-Codex?

GPT-5.3-Codex — it scored 92/100 against 88/100 on our 18-task coding suite, winning 9 tasks to 2 with 7 tied. Every answer was marked blind by three judges from three rival AI labs.

How was this tested?

Both models answered the identical published coding tasks. Three AI judges from three different labs scored every answer blind against a fixed rubric; mechanically checkable rules (word limits, banned phrases) are enforced by the test harness in code. The raw outputs and judge verdicts are downloadable.

More coding head-to-heads: GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-5.6 Luna · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.6 Luna · GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-5.6 Sol · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.6 Sol · GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-5.6 Terra · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Full ranking: Best AI for coding · model pages: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, GPT-5.3-Codex