Best AI for extracting data from text
Scored 100/100 on our 12-task extraction suite — level on quality with 9 others (DeepSeek V4 Pro, GPT-5.6 Terra, Grok 4.5…) — the top spot goes on the tie-break: cleanest rule-compliance, then lowest measured cost; GPT-5.5 sits a single point behind.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the engine inside Gemini. Go to gemini.google.com ↗ — free with a Google account. Paid plans start at £7.99/month (ai plus plan, vendor’s own price). The free tier is Gemini’s, not a promise about this exact model — we haven’t verified which plan carries it. Not fussed about the last point or two? Any of the top 5 here will serve you well.
If you are building anything on an AI, this is the job it does most: turn messy human text into a clean field. It is also the most objectively markable thing on the site — the JSON either parses or it does not — whether the values match is still judged. The suite covers missing fields, ambiguous dates, unit conversion, a fixed label set, and one prompt-injection attempt to see which models follow instructions hidden in the data they were told to treat as data.
updated 13 Aug 2026 · tested by Robert Prime · re-ranks automatically when a new run lands
- All 19 sat the identical 12-task suite — same tasks, same order, one attempt each.
- Every answer marked blind: judges are not told which entrant wrote it.
- Three judges per answer, each from a competing lab. A panel never includes the entrant's own lab.
- Scored 0–10 against a fixed rubric. Answers breaking a task's explicit rules are capped by machine, not by opinion.
- Ties broken by fewest rule breaches, then lowest measured cost — published, not editorial.
- Nobody pays for placement. Last computed 13 Aug 2026.
Every score below links to the raw file behind it: every task, the entrant’s real answer, and all three judges’ marks.
| # | Model | Our score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 100/100 |
| 2 | DeepSeek V4 Prolatest | 100/100 |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Terralatest | 100/100 |
| 4 | Grok 4.5 | 100/100 |
| 5 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 100/100 |
| 6 | GPT-5.3-Codex | 100/100 |
| 7 | Gemini 3.5 Flash | 100/100 |
| 8 | Qwen3.7 Max | 100/100 |
| 9 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 100/100 |
| 10 | Kimi K3 | 100/100 |
| 11 | GPT-5.5 | 99/100 |
| 12 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 98/100 |
| 13 | DeepSeek V4 Flash | 96/100 |
| 14 | GLM 5.2 | 96/100 |
| 15 | Claude Fable 5 | 94/100 |
| 16 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 80/100 |
| 17 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | 79/100 |
| 18 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 67/100 |
| 19 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 59/100 |
“API cost” is what software developers pay to build on a model — ignore it if you just use the website. Each model answers each task once. Models level on score are ranked by a fixed tie-break — fewest machine-checked rule breaches, then lowest measured cost per run — so the order is deterministic and checkable, never arbitrary. Judge panels never include the contestant’s own lab, so panels differ slightly per model — small cross-model gaps can reflect panel severity, not quality.
Made by Google. You use it inside Gemini — nothing to install.
Strongest showing: “Normalise inconsistent units” — scored 10/10 by the panel.
“Correct JSON array with accurate gram conversions, valid format, concise and matches task exactly.”— anthropic/claude-sonnet-5, judging blind · full receipts ↓
12 tasks · 13 Aug 2026 · judges claude-sonnet-5, gpt-5.6-terra, grok-4.5 · API $0.25 in / $1.5 out per 1M tokens · full model page →
Made by DeepSeek — their newest model. You use it inside DeepSeek — nothing to install.
Strongest showing: “Normalise inconsistent units” — scored 10/10 by the panel.
“Correct conversions, valid JSON array, matches required format exactly, concise and accurate.”— anthropic/claude-sonnet-5, judging blind · full receipts ↓
12 tasks · 13 Aug 2026 · judges claude-sonnet-5, gemini-3.1-pro-preview, gpt-5.6-terra · API $0.9553 in / $1.9105 out per 1M tokens · full model page →
Made by OpenAI — their newest model. You use it inside ChatGPT — nothing to install.
Strongest showing: “Normalise inconsistent units” — scored 10/10 by the panel.
“Correct JSON, accurate gram conversions, matches format exactly, concise and clear.”— anthropic/claude-sonnet-5, judging blind · full receipts ↓
12 tasks · 13 Aug 2026 · judges claude-sonnet-5, gemini-3.1-pro-preview, grok-4.5 · API $2 in / $12 out per 1M tokens · full model page →
See it for yourself
One task from the suite, and what the leader, the middle of the table and the bottom actually wrote. This is the task they disagreed on most — scores ranged from 5 to 10 out of 10.
Return ONLY valid JSON, no prose, with keys name, company, role, email: 'You can reach Dr Amara Osei, who heads clinical operations at Northgate Health, on a.osei@northgate-health.co.uk.'
{
"name": "Amara Osei",
"company": "Northgate Health",
"role": "Head of clinical operations",
"email": "a.osei@northgate-health.co.uk"
}Judge: Valid JSON only, with all required keys and accurately extracted company, role, and email. Omitting the honorific from the name is appropriate and does not reduce accuracy.
{"name": "Dr Amara Osei", "company": "Northgate Health", "role": "Head of Clinical Operations", "email": "a.osei@northgate-health.co.uk"}Judge: Correct JSON, all fields accurate, no extra prose, exactly matches required format and content.
```json
{
"name": "Dr Amara Osei",
"company": "Northgate Health",
"role": "heads clinical operations",
"email": "a.osei@northgate-health.co.uk"
}
```Judge: Content is accurate and includes all required keys, but the response is wrapped in Markdown code fences, so it is not strictly only valid JSON.
Trimmed to fit. Every full answer, every judge’s score: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, Kimi K3, Claude Opus 4.6
How this ranking is made
Every model answers the identical published task suite. Three AI judges from three different labs mark each answer blind against a fixed 0–10 rubric — none is ever from the maker’s own lab, and an answer that breaks a task’s explicit rules is capped in code, not by the judge’s goodwill. The score is the average, out of 100.
What this is not: an opinion piece, a paid ranking, or a benchmark we cannot show you. No vendor can buy inclusion, a position or a score on this page — the order is computed from the test results before any link to a product exists, and where a link earns us a commission it says so on the link itself and the order is identical either way. Every score links its raw outputs and judge verdicts. The full protocol · How we make money · receipts: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, DeepSeek V4 Pro, GPT-5.6 Terra, Grok 4.5, GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.3-Codex, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Qwen3.7 Max, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, Kimi K3, GPT-5.5, GPT-5.6 Luna, DeepSeek V4 Flash, GLM 5.2, Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8, Mistral Medium 3.5, Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Opus 4.6
Questions people ask
What is the best AI for extracting data from text in 2026?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads our tested ranking with 100/100 on our 12-task extraction suite, in a dead heat with DeepSeek V4 Pro (100). Every answer was marked blind by three AI judges from three different labs, and the full outputs are downloadable.
How is this ranking made?
Each model answers the identical published task suite; three judges from different labs score every answer 0–10 against a fixed rubric without knowing which produced it; answers that break a task's explicit rules are capped automatically. The score is the average, out of 100. No vendor pays for placement.
What happens when two models score the same?
They are separated by a fixed, published tie-break rather than by editorial choice: first the fewest machine-checked rule breaches, then the lowest measured cost per run. The order is therefore reproducible from the same data, and where the tie-break decides the top place the page says so.
How often does this page update?
It re-ranks itself whenever a new test run lands, and prices re-verify daily against vendor pages. The current ranking was last computed on 13 Aug 2026.
Head-to-heads in extraction
Show all 20 tested pairs ▾
More rankings ▾
Best AI for writing · Best AI chatbot for everyday use · Best AI for coding · Best free AI model · Best AI for spreadsheets and Excel · Best AI essay writer · Best AI for summarising documents · Best AI for writing emails · Best AI for everyday maths and percentages · Best AI for customer service replies · Best AI for revision and study notes · Best AI for vibe coding · Best AI for making flashcards · Best AI for social media posts · Best AI for job applications and cover letters · Best AI for presentations · Best AI for writing your CV · Best AI for research skills · Best AI for creative writing · Best AI for translation · Best AI for travel planning · Best AI for emotional support · Best AI for everyday legal questions · Best AI for health questions · Best AI for writing a book · Best AI for humanising AI text · Best AI research agent · Best AI for code review · Best AI for workflow automation · Best AI for bookkeeping · Best AI for HR and employment questions · Best AI for meeting notes · Best AI for property and lettings · Best-value AI model API · every model we track · every tool