Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 for bookkeeping

The verdict

Claude Fable 5 wins, 8983

Same 12 bookkeeping tasks, marked blind by three rival labs. Claude Fable 5 took 5 tasks, Claude Opus 4.8 took 3, 4 tied. Tested 27 Aug 2026.

Where they differed most

The task — Find the £36

A bank reconciliation will not balance. The bank statement closing balance is £8,412.55. The cash book closing balance is £8,376.55. Outstanding items already accounted for: an unpresented cheque of £120.00 and a lodgement of £120.00 not yet on the statement, which cancel each other out. The bookkeeper has checked her additions twice. The cash book receipts for the month, as entered: £451.00, £1,208.30, £96.75, £2,340.00, £415.00, £188.50. The corresponding bank credits: £415.00, £1,208.30, £96.75, £2,340.00, £451.00, £188.50. Work out the difference, say what kind of error it is, explain the arithmetic rule that identifies this class of error at a glance, and say which side is wrong and how she would prove it. Then say what she should do about it in the ledger and what she should NOT do.

## 1. The difference

£8,412.55 − £8,376.55 = **£36.00** (bank statement is the *higher* figure).

The unpresented cheque (£120.00) and the outstanding lodgement (£120.00) cancel exactly, so they explain nothing. The £36.00 is a genuine error.

## 2. What kind of error

Scanning the receipts against the bank credits, the culprit pair is:

- Cash book entry: **£415.00**
- Bank credit: **£451.00**

This is a **transposition error** — two adjacent digits swapped (the 5 and the 1). Note how easy it was to miss: because *both* amounts (£451.00 and £…
# Bank Reconciliation Error Analysis

## The Difference

£8,412.55 − £8,376.55 = **£36.00**

## Finding the Error

Comparing the cash book receipts with the bank credits:

| Cash book | Bank statement |
|-----------|----------------|
| £451.00 | £415.00 |
| £1,208.30 | £1,208.30 |
| £96.75 | £96.75 |
| £2,340.00 | £2,340.00 |
| £415.00 | £451.00 |
| £188.50 | £188.50 |

The figures **£451.00** and **£415.00** appear in *reversed order*. The digits 5 and 1 have been swapped: £4**51** became £4**15**.

## Kind of Error

This is a **transposition…

Task by task

TaskClaude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.8
The client lunch and the sandwich89
Categorise, and admit what you cannot59
The invoice totals1010
Find the £36103
Profit but no money98
Not your decision to make1010
The faded shoebox99
It is my company, it is my money99
The mileage claim910
Capital or revenue98
Quote, invoice, receipt109
Refuse the backdated invoice95

Full receipts: Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8 · judges gemini-3.1-pro-preview, gpt-5.6-terra, grok-4.5

Questions people ask

Which is better for bookkeeping: Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Fable 5 — it scored 89/100 against 83/100 on our 12-task bookkeeping suite, winning 5 tasks to 3 with 4 tied. Every answer was marked blind by three judges from three rival AI labs.

How was this tested?

Both models answered the identical published bookkeeping tasks. Three AI judges from three different labs scored every answer blind against a fixed rubric; mechanically checkable rules (word limits, banned phrases) are enforced by the test harness in code. The raw outputs and judge verdicts are downloadable.

More bookkeeping head-to-heads: Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra · Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Terra · Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol · Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Sol · Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.3-Codex · Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.3-Codex

Full ranking: Best AI for bookkeeping · model pages: Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8