DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Kimi K3 for bookkeeping
Kimi K3 wins, 84–70
Same 12 bookkeeping tasks, marked blind by three rival labs. Kimi K3 took 7 tasks, DeepSeek V4 Pro took 1, 4 tied. Tested 18 Aug 2026.
Where they differed most
A bank reconciliation will not balance. The bank statement closing balance is £8,412.55. The cash book closing balance is £8,376.55. Outstanding items already accounted for: an unpresented cheque of £120.00 and a lodgement of £120.00 not yet on the statement, which cancel each other out. The bookkeeper has checked her additions twice. The cash book receipts for the month, as entered: £451.00, £1,208.30, £96.75, £2,340.00, £415.00, £188.50. The corresponding bank credits: £415.00, £1,208.30, £96.75, £2,340.00, £451.00, £188.50. Work out the difference, say what kind of error it is, explain the arithmetic rule that identifies this class of error at a glance, and say which side is wrong and how she would prove it. Then say what she should do about it in the ledger and what she should NOT do.
The difference is **£36.00** (£8,412.55 – £8,376.55). **Kind of error:** Transposition error (digits swapped). **Arithmetic rule:** When the difference between two numbers is exactly divisible by 9, it is a strong indicator of a transposition error. Here, £36 ÷ 9 = 4, pointing to a swap of digits that differ by 4 (in this case, 5 and 1 in £451 and £415). **Which side is wrong:** The cash book is wrong. The receipts for £451 and £415 have been entered in the opposite order to the bank credits. **How to prove it:** Check the original…
### 1. Difference
\[
£8,412.55-£8,376.55=\boxed{£36.00}
\]
The unpresented cheque and outstanding lodgement cancel:
\[
£8,412.55-£120+£120=£8,412.55
\]
So the unexplained difference remains **£36, with the bank balance higher than the cash book**.
### 2. Type of error indicated
£36 has the classic signature of a **digit-transposition error**:
\[
£451-£415=£36
\]
The rule is that a difference caused by transposing digits is divisible by 9:
\[
36\div 9=4
\]
For adjacent digits \(a\) and \(b\):
\[
(10a+b)-(10b+a)=9(a-b)
\]
More general…Task by task
| Task | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| The client lunch and the sandwich | 5 | 8 |
| Categorise, and admit what you cannot | 8 | 8 |
| The invoice totals | 10 | 10 |
| Find the £36 | 3 | 10 |
| Profit but no money | 8 | 8 |
| Not your decision to make | 8 | 9 |
| The faded shoebox | 8 | 8 |
| It is my company, it is my money | 7 | 8 |
| The mileage claim | 8 | 9 |
| Capital or revenue | 8 | 6 |
| Quote, invoice, receipt | 6 | 8 |
| Refuse the backdated invoice | 5 | 9 |
Full receipts: DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K3 · judges claude-sonnet-5, gemini-3.1-pro-preview, gpt-5.6-terra
Questions people ask
Which is better for bookkeeping: DeepSeek V4 Pro or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 — it scored 84/100 against 70/100 on our 12-task bookkeeping suite, winning 7 tasks to 1 with 4 tied. Every answer was marked blind by three judges from three rival AI labs.
How was this tested?
Both models answered the identical published bookkeeping tasks. Three AI judges from three different labs scored every answer blind against a fixed rubric; mechanically checkable rules (word limits, banned phrases) are enforced by the test harness in code. The raw outputs and judge verdicts are downloadable.
More bookkeeping head-to-heads: GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3 · DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Sol · GPT-5.5 vs Kimi K3 · DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.5 · Grok 4.5 vs Kimi K3 · DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 4.5
Full ranking: Best AI for bookkeeping · model pages: DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K3