Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.5 for bookkeeping
GPT-5.5 wins, 92–78
Same 12 bookkeeping tasks, marked blind by three rival labs. GPT-5.5 took 9 tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview took 0, 3 tied. Tested 18 Aug 2026.
Where they differed most
A bank reconciliation will not balance. The bank statement closing balance is £8,412.55. The cash book closing balance is £8,376.55. Outstanding items already accounted for: an unpresented cheque of £120.00 and a lodgement of £120.00 not yet on the statement, which cancel each other out. The bookkeeper has checked her additions twice. The cash book receipts for the month, as entered: £451.00, £1,208.30, £96.75, £2,340.00, £415.00, £188.50. The corresponding bank credits: £415.00, £1,208.30, £96.75, £2,340.00, £451.00, £188.50. Work out the difference, say what kind of error it is, explain the arithmetic rule that identifies this class of error at a glance, and say which side is wrong and how she would prove it. Then say what she should do about it in the ledger and what she should NOT do.
**1. Work out the difference** The bank statement closing balance is £8,412.55. The cash book closing balance is £8,376.55. The difference is **£36.00** (£8,412.55 - £8,376.55). *(Note: The outstanding unpresented cheque and uncredited lodgement of £120.00 perfectly cancel each other out, so they do not affect this £36.00 difference).* **2. What kind of error is it?** This is a **transposition error** (specifically, reversing two adjacent digits when recording a number). **3. The arithmetic rule that identifies this class of error at a gl…
Adjusted bank statement balance: - Bank statement closing balance: **£8,412.55** - Less unpresented cheque: **£120.00** - Add lodgement not yet credited: **£120.00** These cancel, so adjusted bank balance remains **£8,412.55**. Cash book balance: **£8,376.55** So the difference is: **£8,412.55 − £8,376.55 = £36.00** The bank is **£36.00 higher** than the cash book. This is the classic sign of a **transposition error**: **£451** and **£415** have been interchanged. Arithmetic rule: a transposition error is usually divisible by **9**. Her…
Task by task
| Task | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| The client lunch and the sandwich | 7 | 9.5 |
| Categorise, and admit what you cannot | 9 | 9 |
| The invoice totals | 10 | 10 |
| Find the £36 | 3 | 8 |
| Profit but no money | 8 | 9 |
| Not your decision to make | 8 | 9 |
| The faded shoebox | 9 | 9 |
| It is my company, it is my money | 7 | 8 |
| The mileage claim | 8 | 10 |
| Capital or revenue | 8 | 10 |
| Quote, invoice, receipt | 7 | 9 |
| Refuse the backdated invoice | 9 | 10 |
Full receipts: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, GPT-5.5 · judges claude-sonnet-5, gpt-5.6-terra, grok-4.5
Questions people ask
Which is better for bookkeeping: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.5?
GPT-5.5 — it scored 92/100 against 78/100 on our 12-task bookkeeping suite, winning 9 tasks to 0 with 3 tied. Every answer was marked blind by three judges from three rival AI labs.
How was this tested?
Both models answered the identical published bookkeeping tasks. Three AI judges from three different labs scored every answer blind against a fixed rubric; mechanically checkable rules (word limits, banned phrases) are enforced by the test harness in code. The raw outputs and judge verdicts are downloadable.
More bookkeeping head-to-heads: GPT-5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.6 Sol · GPT-5.5 vs Grok 4.5 · GPT-5.5 vs Kimi K3 · Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5 · GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.5
Full ranking: Best AI for bookkeeping · model pages: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, GPT-5.5