GPT-5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna for vibe coding
Effectively a dead heat: 97–96
Same 12 vibe coding tasks, marked blind by three rival labs. GPT-5.6 Luna took 1 task, GPT-5.5 took 2, 9 tied. Tested 16 Aug 2026.
Where they differed most
Here is a working tip calculator: <input id="bill" type="number"><select id="pct"><option>10</option><option>15</option><option>20</option></select><button onclick="calc()">Go</button><p id="out"></p><script>function calc(){out.innerText='£'+(bill.value*(1+pct.value/100)).toFixed(2)}</script>. WITHOUT rewriting it from scratch, list the 3 highest-impact improvements as bullets (max 15 words each), then return the file with ONLY those 3 changes applied.
- Add labels and live output for better accessibility.
- Validate non-negative bill amounts before calculating.
- Replace inline click handler with scoped event listener.
```html
<label for="bill">Bill</label>
<input id="bill" type="number" min="0" step="0.01" required>
<label for="pct">Tip %</label>
<select id="pct">
<option>10</option>
<option>15</option>
<option>20</option>
</select>
<button id="calcBtn">Go</button>
<p id="out" aria-live="polite"></p>
<script>
const billEl = document.getElementById('bill');
const pctEl = document.g…- Add explicit labels for bill and percentage controls to improve accessibility. - Validate bill input and constrain it to nonnegative currency values. - Replace fragile implicit element globals with explicit DOM lookups and `textContent`. ```html <label for="bill">Bill amount</label> <input id="bill" type="number" min="0" step="0.01" required> <label for="pct">Tip percentage</label> <select id="pct"> <option>10</option> <option>15</option> <option>20</option> </select> <button onclick="calc()">Go</button> <p id="out"></p> <script> funct…
Task by task
| Task | GPT-5.5 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Countdown timer app | 10 | 10 |
| Expense splitter | 10 | 9 |
| Quiz from a list | 10 | 10 |
| Fix my broken page | 10 | 10 |
| Colour palette picker | 10 | 9 |
| Explain before building | 10 | 10 |
| Unit converter | 10 | 10 |
| Sortable table | 10 | 10 |
| Say what you cannot build | 10 | 10 |
| Memory pairs game | 10 | 10 |
| Improve, don't rewrite | 5 | 8 |
| Refuse the harvester | 10 | 10 |
Full receipts: GPT-5.5, GPT-5.6 Luna · judges claude-sonnet-5, gemini-3.1-pro-preview, grok-4.5
Questions people ask
Which is better for vibe coding: GPT-5.5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Effectively a dead heat: GPT-5.6 Luna edged it 97/100 to 96/100 on our vibe coding suite — too close to matter, so pick on price or the product you already use.
How was this tested?
Both models answered the identical published vibe coding tasks. Three AI judges from three different labs scored every answer blind against a fixed rubric; mechanically checkable rules (word limits, banned phrases) are enforced by the test harness in code. The raw outputs and judge verdicts are downloadable.
More vibe coding head-to-heads: Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Luna · Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5 · GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-5.6 Luna · GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-5.5 · GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5.6 Sol · GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5.6 Terra
Full ranking: Best AI for vibe coding · model pages: GPT-5.5, GPT-5.6 Luna