Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max for meeting notes
Grok 4.5 wins, 94–89
Same 12 meeting notes tasks, marked blind by three rival labs. Grok 4.5 took 4 tasks, Qwen3.7 Max took 0, 8 tied. Tested 28 Aug 2026.
Where they differed most
Transcript extract, board update. FINANCE LEAD: 'Churn was four point two percent in July… sorry, four point two for the quarter, July on its own was three point one.' CHAIR: 'And that's up?' FINANCE LEAD: 'Up from two point eight the quarter before.' CHAIR: 'Right.' Write the three-line summary of the churn position for people who were not in the room. It must carry the corrected figures, must make clear which number is monthly and which is quarterly, and must not present the retracted reading as fact. Under 70 words.
Churn was 4.2% for the quarter. This was up from 2.8% the prior quarter. July’s monthly churn was 3.1%.
Quarterly churn increased to 4.2% for the latest quarter, up from 2.8% the prior quarter. Monthly churn for July was 3.1%, correcting the initial misstatement that applied the quarterly rate to July. These corrected figures confirm a clear upward trend in overall customer churn.
Task by task
| Task | Grok 4.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| The decision that was never made | 10 | 9 |
| Actions, owners, and the one with neither | 10 | 10 |
| The number said twice | 10 | 8 |
| Minutes for a meeting with a disagreement in it | 10 | 9 |
| Fourteen minutes, one sentence | 10 | 10 |
| Crosstalk | 10 | 10 |
| The musing that is not a commitment | 10 | 10 |
| The follow-up email nobody has to rewrite | 10 | 10 |
| Extract the dates, resolve the relatives | 10 | 10 |
| Who has not spoken | 8 | 8 |
| Notes for the person who missed it | 6 | 6 |
| The transcript is wrong | 9 | 7 |
Full receipts: Grok 4.5, Qwen3.7 Max · judges claude-sonnet-5, gemini-3.1-pro-preview, gpt-5.6-terra
Questions people ask
Which is better for meeting notes: Grok 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Grok 4.5 — it scored 94/100 against 89/100 on our 12-task meeting notes suite, winning 4 tasks to 0 with 8 tied. Every answer was marked blind by three judges from three rival AI labs.
How was this tested?
Both models answered the identical published meeting notes tasks. Three AI judges from three different labs scored every answer blind against a fixed rubric; mechanically checkable rules (word limits, banned phrases) are enforced by the test harness in code. The raw outputs and judge verdicts are downloadable.
More meeting notes head-to-heads: GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.5 · GPT-5.5 vs Grok 4.5 · GPT-5.3-Codex vs Grok 4.5 · Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4.5 · GPT-5.6 Terra vs Grok 4.5 · GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.5
Full ranking: Best AI for meeting notes · model pages: Grok 4.5, Qwen3.7 Max