GPT-5.3-Codex vs Qwen3.7 Max for CV writing
GPT-5.3-Codex wins, 93–87
Same 12 CV writing tasks, marked blind by three rival labs. GPT-5.3-Codex took 6 tasks, Qwen3.7 Max took 1, 5 tied. Tested 16 Aug 2026.
Where they differed most
Put this work history into correct reverse-chronological CV order and flag anything a recruiter will query: Greggs, team member, 2016-2018; Openreach, trainee engineer, Jan 2021-present; B&Q, weekend supervisor, 2017-2019; self-employed handyman, 2019-2021 'on and off'. State the overlap you found, the vague period, and write the one honest line you would put under the handyman entry to pre-empt the question.
Here’s the **correct reverse-chronological order** for your CV: 1. **Openreach** – Trainee Engineer *(Jan 2021–Present)* 2. **Self-employed Handyman** *(2019–2021, on and off)* 3. **B&Q** – Weekend Supervisor *(2017–2019)* 4. **Greggs** – Team Member *(2016–2018)* ### What a recruiter will likely query - **Overlap 1:** **Greggs (2016–2018)** and **B&Q (2017–2019)** overlap in **2017–2018**. - Likely fine if one/both were part-time or weekend work, but they may ask. - **Overlap 2:** **B&Q (2017–2019)** and **Handyman (2019–2021)*…
**Reverse-Chronological CV Order** * **Openreach** | Trainee Engineer | Jan 2021 – Present * **Self-Employed** | Handyman | 2019 – 2021 * **B&Q** | Weekend Supervisor | 2017 – 2019 * **Greggs** | Team Member | 2016 – 2018 *** **What a Recruiter Will Query (Flags)** * **Lack of months:** Aside from the current role, using only years makes it impossible for a recruiter to map your exact timeline, check for hidden employment gaps, or verify right-to-work/visa timelines. * **The "On and off" nature:** Recruiters view sporadic self-e…
Task by task
| Task | GPT-5.3-Codex | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Profile that mirrors the ad | 9 | 8 |
| Untangle the dates | 9 | 6 |
| Duties into achievements | 9 | 10 |
| Thirty years onto two pages | 9 | 8 |
| Profile without the wallpaper | 10 | 10 |
| First CV, empty history | 9 | 8 |
| Back after eight years | 9 | 9 |
| Do the hobbies earn their line? | 9 | 9 |
| Fix the format | 10 | 9 |
| The Excel question | 9 | 8 |
| Strip the header | 9 | 9 |
| Refuse the invented job | 10 | 10 |
Full receipts: GPT-5.3-Codex, Qwen3.7 Max · judges claude-sonnet-5, gemini-3.1-pro-preview, grok-4.5
Questions people ask
Which is better for CV writing: GPT-5.3-Codex or Qwen3.7 Max?
GPT-5.3-Codex — it scored 93/100 against 87/100 on our 12-task CV writing suite, winning 6 tasks to 1 with 5 tied. Every answer was marked blind by three judges from three rival AI labs.
How was this tested?
Both models answered the identical published CV writing tasks. Three AI judges from three different labs scored every answer blind against a fixed rubric; mechanically checkable rules (word limits, banned phrases) are enforced by the test harness in code. The raw outputs and judge verdicts are downloadable.
More CV writing head-to-heads: GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-5.5 · GPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max · Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.3-Codex · GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-5.6 Sol · Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.3-Codex · GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-5.6 Terra
Full ranking: Best AI for CV writing · model pages: GPT-5.3-Codex, Qwen3.7 Max